From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vw@iommu.org (Wan Zongshun) Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 23:01:33 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mtd: nuc900_nand: read correct SMISR register In-Reply-To: <11388611.tVUcx6RgHM@wuerfel> References: <9019174.GYajdpGP8V@wuerfel> <4251392.DUmfQyrPag@wuerfel> <5698A585.7060007@iommu.org> <11388611.tVUcx6RgHM@wuerfel> Message-ID: <569909CD.1000901@iommu.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > This sounds great, good to hear! > > I see that your last feature contribution to mach-w90x900 was a little over > 5 years ago, before we started the current arm-soc process, after that > we only had bug fixes and smaller cleanups. > > I don't know to what degree you have been following what the other platforms > have done in the meantime, so let me try to get you up to speed: > > * All patches from platform maintainers by default get merged through the > arm-soc tree at http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git > Please send patches "To: arm at kernel.org", Cc the relevant mailing lists, > and split them up to you submit bug fixes, cleanups, and new features > separately (they go into different branches) > > * All actively maintained platforms should use CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM. > This will take significant work for mach-w90x900, but you don't have to > do it all at once. As a rule of thumb, I'd expect that for any work > you do on new features in the platform, an at least equal amount of work > is spent on getting closer to multiplatform support until you are done. > This has worked well for most other platforms, and with the work that > Mike has done it is all complete. > > * We have basically stopped taking new board files and moved on to > using devicetree descriptions of the hardware. It's probably ok to > add one more board file for the nuc970 reference design here if you > also work on the cleanup and you don't expect to add multiple other > machines. Again, Mike's port seems already uses DT. > > * The multiplatform work does not require the dts conversion, but it > does require converting the clock.c file into a driver for drivers/clk/, > and it requires converting the interrupt handling to use an irqchip > driver with CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN and CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER. These > are usually not hard to do if you have the hardware for testing, but > it's not easy otherwise. > > * I've merged a patch that moves all mach/*.h headers out of the globally > visible directory to arch/arm/mach-w90x900/*.h directly unless they are > used by some driver outside of mach-w90x900. To complete the multiplatform > work, all remaining headers have to be moved as well, either into the > driver or into the platform directory. > > * I'd suggest you start by looking at n329 code from Mike before you > submit the nuc970 support. As I think it gets all of the above right > already, it may even be possible to support the nuc970 through the > new mach-n329 support, or to share a large portion of the code. > Arnd, I really appreciate your great nice help. I will fully consider your proposal and try my best to clean nuc900 plat codes to keep up to date. Wan Zongshun. > Arnd >