public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: javier@osg.samsung.com (Javier Martinez Canillas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/8] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:15:47 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A0F623.8000004@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A02AD4.40107@samsung.com>

Hello Krzysztof,

On 01/20/2016 09:48 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21.01.2016 02:14, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On a recent disussion [0] with Krzysztof Kozlowski and Laxman Dewangan,
>> we came to the conclusion that the max77686 and max77802 RTC are almost
>> the same with only a few differences so there shouldn't be two separate
>> drivers and is better to extend max77686 driver and delete rtc-max77802.
>>
>> By making the driver more generic, other RTC IP blocks from Maxim PMICs
>> could be supported as well like the max77620.
>>
>> Patches #1 is just a trivial cleanup.
>>
>> Patch #2 allows to support RTCs that need a shorter delay when updating
>> the RTC.
>>
>> Patch #3 adds a driver data structure to avoid hard-coding parameters
>> specific to a certain RTC such as the needed delay and RTC register mask.
>>
>> Patch #4 changes the driver to use a mapping table instead of using the
>> max77686 registers offsets directly to allow supporting RTC with other
>> registers addresses and layout.
>>
>> Patch #5 Adds support for max77802 to max77686 RTC driver and patch #6
>> removes the old driver since is not needed anymore.
>>
>> Finally patch #7 and patch #8 removes the Kconfig symbol from defconfigs.
>>
>> I've tested this patch-set on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi Chromebook that has
>> a max77802 PMIC and the RTC was working correctly but I don't have a
>> machine with max77686 so I will really appreaciate if someone can test
>> that no regressions were introduced.
>>
>
> Thanks for the submission. I like the approach. I'll start reviewing the
> code and testing it... or maybe I'll wait with testing for v2 because I
> already sent some comments. :)
>
> Anyway I will provide later tested-by on max77686.
>

Thanks a lot for your detailed review. I'll post v2 shortly so you can
just test that.
  
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

      reply	other threads:[~2016-01-21 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-20 17:14 [PATCH 0/8] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-01-20 17:14 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Remove MAX77802 RTC Kconfig symbol Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-01-21  1:58   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-21  0:30 ` [PATCH 0/8] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support Alexandre Belloni
2016-01-21  0:34   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-21 14:50     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-01-21  0:48 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-21 15:15   ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56A0F623.8000004@osg.samsung.com \
    --to=javier@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox