From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: akshay.bhat@timesys.com (Akshay Bhat) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:54:26 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v6 6/7] ARM: dts: imx: Add support for Advantech/GE B650v3 In-Reply-To: <20160128061919.GG9070@tiger> References: <1450908016-17384-1-git-send-email-akshay.bhat@timesys.com> <1450908016-17384-7-git-send-email-akshay.bhat@timesys.com> <20160128061919.GG9070@tiger> Message-ID: <56AA63E2.5090103@timesys.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 01/28/2016 01:19 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 05:00:15PM -0500, Akshay Bhat wrote: >> Add support for Advantech/GE B650v3 board. >> >> Signed-off-by: Akshay Bhat >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 + >> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b650v3.dts | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > I compare it with imx6q-b450v3.dts. They are basically identical except > model name and compatible string. What are the differences between > these two boards from hardware POV? Can we support them with one > dts/dtb, so that we can save one duplicated dts? > > Shawn The boards are different form factors. Since the hardware layout is different there are some board specific imx6 register settings needed (eg: usb phy settings, pcie gpr8 settings etc.). We are in the process of submitting imx driver patches for the same and expect the imx6q-b450v3.dts and imx6q-b650v3.dts to be different in the near future. Hence would like to keep them separate. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/568166/ Thanks, Akshay