[PATCH v10 07/21] KVM: ARM64: PMU: Add perf event map and introduce perf event creating function

[shannon.zhao@linaro.org (Shannon Zhao)]

On 2016/1/29 18:18, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 02:26:31PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >On 2016/1/29 2:06, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> > >On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 04:45:36PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>>> > >> >On 28/01/16 16:31, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>>>>>> > >>> > >On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:51:35AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>From: Shannon Zhao<shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>When we use tools like perf on host, perf passes the event type and the
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>id of this event type category to kernel, then kernel will map them to
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>hardware event number and write this number to PMU PMEVTYPER<n>_EL0
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>register. When getting the event number in KVM, directly use raw event
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>type to create a perf_event for it.
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao<shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier<marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>---
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pmu.h |   3 ++
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>  arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile      |   1 +
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>  include/kvm/arm_pmu.h        |  10 ++++
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>  virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c           | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>  4 files changed, 136 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>  create mode 100644 virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pmu.h
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>index 4406184..2588f9c 100644
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pmu.h
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pmu.h
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>  #define ARMV8_MAX_COUNTERS      32
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>  #define ARMV8_COUNTER_MASK      (ARMV8_MAX_COUNTERS - 1)
>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>+#define ARMV8_CYCLE_IDX         (ARMV8_MAX_COUNTERS - 1)
>>>>>>> > >>> > >
>>>>>>> > >>> > >I'm not sure we want to add this. It's name is wrong, as it's really
>>>>>>> > >>> > >PMCNTENSET_EL0.C, and just a few lines above we have the idx defined
>>>>>>> > >>> > >already (ARMV8_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER), but as zero, because
>>>>>>> > >>> > >arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c maps it that way.
>>>>>>> > >>> > >
>>>>>>> > >>> > >I think we should do the same with the pmc array, i.e. map the cycle
>>>>>>> > >>> > >counter to idx zero.
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> >I tend to have the opposite view. Not for the sake of it, but because I
>>>>> > >> >find it helpful to directly map the code to the architecture
>>>>> > >> >documentation without having to bend another handful of neurons.
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> >Will probably had some good reasons to structure it that way, but I
>>>>> > >> >don't know the rational. Will?
>>> > >It was years ago, but I suspect that the cycle counter is index zero
>>> > >because its mandated, whilst the number of event counters is IMPDEF.
>> >
>> >Since PMCNTENSET/CLR, PMINTENSET/CLR, PMOVSSET/CLR and PMSWINC are using
>> >bit 31 to stands the state of cycle counter, if we make cycle counter
>> >index to zero, we always need to do translation between the idx and bit
>> >31 when we access these registers.
> Conversely, if you stick the cycle counter right at the top, then you'll
> need to rework a bunch of the perf code that iterates from
> ARMV7_IDX_COUNTER0 to pmu->num_events.

But actually this doesn't affect the perf code now because it's just a 
internal PMC array index of kvm arm guest pmu codes.
And having a look at the ARMv8 SPEC, it says
"
PMCCFILTR_EL0 can also be accessed by using PMXEVTYPER_EL0 with 
PMSELR_EL0.SEL set to 0b11111.
"
Apparently it treats the index of cycle counter as 31 not zero. Also 
regarding the PMCR.N field my understanding is that it just stands the 
number of counters not the counter's order or index. Looking at the 
description of PMSEL.SEL field, it says "This field can take any value 
from 0 (0b00000) to (PMCR.N)-1, or 31 (0b11111)." while it's not "This 
field can take any value from 1 (0b00001) to (PMCR.N), or 0."

Thanks,
-- 
Shannon