From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: matthias.bgg@gmail.com (Matthias Brugger) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:46:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v6] clk: mediatek: Export CPU mux clocks for CPU frequency control In-Reply-To: References: <1442230072-31593-1-git-send-email-pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org> <20151217090628.GA317@quark.deferred.io> Message-ID: <56AF459F.2050808@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 26/01/16 11:23, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > Hi Michael, Pi-Cheng, > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Michael Turquette > wrote: >> >> On 12/01, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Kurtz wrote: >>>> Hi Pi-Cheng and Michael, >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: >>>>> From: "pi-cheng.chen" >>>>> >>>>> This patch adds CPU mux clocks which are used by Mediatek cpufreq driver >>>>> for intermediate clock source switching. >>>> >>>> It looks like this patch was never picked up. >>>> It is required for MT8173 cpufreq. >>>> >>>> What is the plan to get this one merged? >>> >>> Hi Dan, >>> Mike is working on a new CCF feature called "coordinated clock rate changes" >>> which would help to migrate mt8173-cpufreq driver to generic cpufreq-dt >>> driver, and I am working with him to port MT8173 clock driver on the new >>> feature. So I think that's why this patch was not picked since it will >>> be migrated to new implementation once the new feature's ready. >>> >>> @Mike: >>> Are you plannig to post those patches on the mailing list ? >>> Or is it fine for you to take this first and then I will refine it for >>> the new feature later? >> >> I plan to post those patches next week. > > Were these patches ever posted? > Or should we consider going ahead and trying to merge this 4-month old > MTK CPU mux clock patch into v4.5 before it is too late? > It's already too late for v4.5. The -rc are mostly bug fixes and new features get merged after the official v4.5 release. They will show up in v4.6-rc1