From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: yang.shi@linaro.org (Shi, Yang) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:54:27 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust In-Reply-To: <56BE18AB.4090902@linaro.org> References: <1455227590-9837-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org> <56BDE260.20504@arm.com> <56BE18AB.4090902@linaro.org> Message-ID: <56BE1C53.8070605@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2/12/2016 9:38 AM, Shi, Yang wrote: > On 2/12/2016 5:47 AM, James Morse wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On 11/02/16 21:53, Yang Shi wrote: >>> Switching between stacks is only valid if we are tracing ourselves >>> while on the >>> irq_stack, so it is only valid when in current and non-preemptible >>> context, >>> otherwise is is just zeroed off. >> >> Given it was picked up with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT: >> >> Fixes: 132cd887b5c5 ("arm64: Modify stack trace and dump for use with >> irq_stack") > > Wii add in v2. > >> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 13 ++++++------- >>> arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 11 ++++++++++- >>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c >>> b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c >>> index 12a18cb..d9751a4 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c >>> @@ -44,14 +44,13 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, >>> struct stackframe *frame) >>> unsigned long irq_stack_ptr; >>> >>> /* >>> - * Use raw_smp_processor_id() to avoid false-positives from >>> - * CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT. get_wchan() calls unwind_frame() on >>> sleeping >>> - * task stacks, we can be pre-empted in this case, so >>> - * {raw_,}smp_processor_id() may give us the wrong value. Sleeping >>> - * tasks can't ever be on an interrupt stack, so regardless of cpu, >>> - * the checks will always fail. >>> + * Switching between stacks is valid when tracing current and in >>> + * non-preemptible context. >>> */ >>> - irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(raw_smp_processor_id()); >>> + if (tsk == current && !preemptible()) >>> + irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(smp_processor_id()); >>> + else >>> + irq_stack_ptr = 0; >>> >>> low = frame->sp; >>> /* irq stacks are not THREAD_SIZE aligned */ >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c >>> index cbedd72..7d8db3a 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c >>> @@ -146,9 +146,18 @@ static void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct >>> pt_regs *regs) >>> static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct >>> *tsk) >>> { >>> struct stackframe frame; >>> - unsigned long irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(smp_processor_id()); >>> + unsigned long irq_stack_ptr; >>> int skip; >>> >>> + /* >>> + * Switching between stacks is valid when tracing current and in >> >> Nit: Two spaces: "between[ ][ ]stacks" > > Will fix in v2. > >> >> >>> + * non-preemptible context. >>> + */ >>> + if (tsk == current && !preemptible()) >>> + irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(smp_processor_id()); >>> + else >>> + irq_stack_ptr = 0; >>> + >>> pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk); >>> >>> if (!tsk) >>> >> >> Neither file includes 'linux/preempt.h' for the definition of >> preemptible(). >> (I can't talk: I should have included smp.h for smp_processor_id()) > > I tried to build the kernel with preempt and without preempt, both > works. And, I saw arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild has: > > generic-y += preempt.h > > So, it sounds preempt.h has been included by default. In addition, linux/sched.h, which is included by both traps.c and stacktrace.c, includes preempt.h already. Yang > > Thanks, > Yang > >> >> >> Acked-by: James Morse >> Tested-by: James Morse >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> James >> >> >