linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: matthias.bgg@gmail.com (Matthias Brugger)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5sub1 0/8] arm64: split linear and kernel mappings
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:29:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C1D2CF.1010108@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_29SjYgg+P3fyGFcaRVxjapVzMs85Y2frd7_f51mPv-A@mail.gmail.com>



On 13/02/16 15:28, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 12 February 2016 at 21:10, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/02/16 20:47, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12 February 2016 at 20:45, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Ard,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 01/02/16 11:54, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> At the request of Catalin, this series has been split off from my series
>>>>> 'arm64: implement support for KASLR v4' [1]. This sub-series deals with
>>>>> moving the kernel out of the linear mapping into the vmalloc area. This
>>>>> is a prerequisite for independent physical and virtual randomization of
>>>>> the kernel image. On top of that, considering that these changes allow
>>>>> the linear mapping to start at an arbitrary offset above PAGE_OFFSET, it
>>>>> should be an improvement in itself due to the fact that we can now
>>>>> choose
>>>>> PAGE_OFFSET such that RAM can be mapped using large block sizes.
>>>>>
>>>>> For instance, on my Seattle A0 box, the kernel is loaded 16 MB into the
>>>>> lowest GB of RAM, which means __pa(PAGE_OFFSET) is not 1 GB aligned, and
>>>>> the entire 16 GB of RAM will be mapping using 2 MB blocks. (Similarly,
>>>>> for 64 KB granule kernels, the entire 16 GB of RAM will be mapped using
>>>>> pages since __pa(PAGE_OFFSET) is not 512 MB aligned). With these changes
>>>>>     __pa(PAGE_OFFSET) will always be chosen such that it is aligned to a
>>>>> quantity that allows efficient mapping.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that of the entire KASLR series, this sub-series is the most likely
>>>>> to
>>>>> cause problems, and hence requires the most careful review and testing.
>>>>> This
>>>>> is due to the fact that, with these changes, the invariant __va(__pa(x))
>>>>> == x
>>>>> no longer holds, and any code that is based on that assumption needs to
>>>>> be
>>>>> updated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since v4:
>>>>> - added Marc's ack to patch #6
>>>>> - round the kasan zero shadow region around the kernel image to swapper
>>>>> block
>>>>>      size (#7)
>>>>> - ensure that we don't clip the kernel image when clipping RAM to the
>>>>> linear
>>>>>      region size (#8)
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch #1 allows the low mark of memblocks discovered from the FDT to be
>>>>> overridden by the architecture.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch #2 enables the huge-vmap generic feature for arm64. This should be
>>>>> an
>>>>> improvement in itself, but the significance for this series is that it
>>>>> allows
>>>>> unmap_kernel_range() to be called on the [__init_begin, __init_end)
>>>>> region,
>>>>> which may be partially mapped using block mappings.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch #3 introduces KIMAGE_VADDR as a separate, preparatory step towards
>>>>> decoupling the kernel placement from PAGE_OFFSET
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch #4 implements some translation table accessors that operate on
>>>>> statically
>>>>> allocate translation tables before the linear mapping is up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch #5 decouples the fixmap initialization from the linear mapping, by
>>>>> using
>>>>> the accessors implemented by patch #4
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch #6 removes assumptions made my KVM regarding the placement of the
>>>>> kernel
>>>>> image inside the linear mapping.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch #7 moves the kernel image from the base of the linear mapping to
>>>>> the
>>>>> base
>>>>> of the vmalloc area. The modules area, which sits right below the kernel
>>>>> image,
>>>>> is moved along and is put right before the start of the vmalloc area.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch #8 decouples PHYS_OFFSET from PAGE_OFFSET, which allows the linear
>>>>> mapping
>>>>> to cover all discovered memory, regardless of where the kernel image is
>>>>> located
>>>>> in it. This effectively allows the kernel to be loaded at any physical
>>>>> address
>>>>> (provided that the correct alignment is used)
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2135931
>>>>>
>>>>> Ard Biesheuvel (8):
>>>>>      of/fdt: make memblock minimum physical address arch configurable
>>>>>      arm64: add support for ioremap() block mappings
>>>>>      arm64: introduce KIMAGE_VADDR as the virtual base of the kernel
>>>>> region
>>>>>      arm64: pgtable: implement static [pte|pmd|pud]_offset variants
>>>>>      arm64: decouple early fixmap init from linear mapping
>>>>>      arm64: kvm: deal with kernel symbols outside of linear mapping
>>>>>      arm64: move kernel image to base of vmalloc area
>>>>>      arm64: allow kernel Image to be loaded anywhere in physical memory
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I bisected linux-next (20160212) with the following error on booting with
>>>> an
>>>> initramfs:
>>>>    Failed to execute /init (error -8)
>>>>    request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c
>>>>    Starting init: /sbin/init exists but couldn't execute it (error -8)
>>>>    request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c
>>>>    Starting init: /bin/sh exists but couldn't execute it (error -8)
>>>>    Kernel panic - not syncing: No working init found.  Try passing init=
>>>> option to kernel. See Linux Documentation/init..
>>>>
>>>> I tracked down the error to patch 7 of this series. But I realized that
>>>> patch 7 does not compile, but from patch 8 onwards I observe the error.
>>>>
>
> As far as this failure is concerned, I managed to reproduce an error
> with patch #7 and not #8 applied, involving out of range kvm symbols
> at link time. This is reproducible with GCC 4.8 but not GCC 4.9 or
> later. Is this what you were seeing as well? Or is there another
> problem?
>

I realized that I used " aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Linaro GCC 2014.11) 
4.9.3 20141031 (prerelease)"  which gave me errors like:

arch/arm64/kvm/built-in.o: In function `__cpu_init_hyp_mode':
/home/mbrugger/src/linux-next/./arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h:331:(.text+0x73b4): 
relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 against symbol 
`__kvm_hyp_vector' defined in .hyp.text section in arch/arm64/kvm/built-in.o

So it was time to update my toolchain to "aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Linaro 
GCC 5.1-2015.08) 5.1.1 20150608" which fixed the problem for me.

Thanks,
Matthias

>
>>>> I use defconfig with an initramfs.cpio created with buildroot.
>>>> I tested this on my mt8173 eval board, but I suppose this can be
>>>> reproduced
>>>> easily on other machines as well.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report. Does this help at all?
>>>
>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/477645
>>>
>>
>> I applied them on top of linux-next and this fixed the problem.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>     Documentation/arm64/booting.txt                      |  20 ++-
>>>>>     Documentation/features/vm/huge-vmap/arch-support.txt |   2 +-
>>>>>     arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h                       |   2 +
>>>>>     arch/arm/kvm/arm.c                                   |   8 +-
>>>>>     arch/arm64/Kconfig                                   |   1 +
>>>>>     arch/arm64/include/asm/boot.h                        |   6 +
>>>>>     arch/arm64/include/asm/kasan.h                       |   2 +-
>>>>>     arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h              |  12 ++
>>>>>     arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h                     |   2 +
>>>>>     arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h                    |   8 +-
>>>>>     arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h                      |  44 ++++--
>>>>>     arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h                     |  23 ++-
>>>>>     arch/arm64/kernel/head.S                             |   8 +-
>>>>>     arch/arm64/kernel/image.h                            |  13 +-
>>>>>     arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S                      |   4 +-
>>>>>     arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S                                 |   6 +-
>>>>>     arch/arm64/mm/dump.c                                 |  12 +-
>>>>>     arch/arm64/mm/init.c                                 | 123
>>>>> ++++++++++++++--
>>>>>     arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c                           |  31 +++-
>>>>>     arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c                                  | 155
>>>>> +++++++++++++++-----
>>>>>     drivers/of/fdt.c                                     |   5 +-
>>>>>     21 files changed, 378 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-15 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-01 10:54 [PATCH v5sub1 0/8] arm64: split linear and kernel mappings Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 1/8] of/fdt: make memblock minimum physical address arch configurable Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 2/8] arm64: add support for ioremap() block mappings Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 14:10   ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-01 14:56     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 3/8] arm64: introduce KIMAGE_VADDR as the virtual base of the kernel region Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 4/8] arm64: pgtable: implement static [pte|pmd|pud]_offset variants Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 5/8] arm64: decouple early fixmap init from linear mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 6/8] arm64: kvm: deal with kernel symbols outside of " Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 7/8] arm64: move kernel image to base of vmalloc area Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 12:24   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-01 12:27     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 13:41       ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-01 14:32   ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-12 14:58   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-12 15:02     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-12 15:10       ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-12 15:17         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-12 15:26           ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-12 15:38             ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-12 16:06               ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-12 16:44                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-15 14:28                 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-15 14:35                   ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-15 18:59                   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-16 12:59                     ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-16 14:12                       ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-16 14:29                         ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-16 15:17                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-16 15:36                         ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-16 16:42                           ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-17  9:15                             ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-17 10:10                               ` James Morse
2016-02-17 10:19                                 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-17 10:36                                   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-17 10:18                               ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-17 10:48                                 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-17 14:39                       ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-17 16:31                         ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-17 19:35                           ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-17 17:01                         ` KASAN issues with idle / hotplug area (was: Re: [PATCH v5sub1 7/8] arm64: move kernel image to base of vmalloc area) Mark Rutland
2016-02-17 17:56                           ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-17 19:16                             ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-18  8:06                               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-18  8:22                               ` KASAN issues with idle / hotplug area Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-18  8:42                                 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-18  9:38                                 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-18 11:34                                   ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-18  9:39                                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-18 11:38                                   ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-18 11:45                                   ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-18 11:15                                 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-18 11:46                                   ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-02-18 12:08                                     ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-12 17:47   ` [PATCH v5sub1 7/8] arm64: move kernel image to base of vmalloc area James Morse
2016-02-12 18:01     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v5sub1 8/8] arm64: allow kernel Image to be loaded anywhere in physical memory Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 14:50   ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-01 16:28     ` Fu Wei
2016-02-16  8:55       ` Fu Wei
2016-02-01 15:06   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-01 15:13     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 16:31       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 17:31         ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-01 17:57           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-01 18:02             ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-01 18:30               ` [PATCH] arm64: move back to generic memblock_enforce_memory_limit() Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-02 10:19                 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-02 10:28                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-02 10:44                     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-12 19:45 ` [PATCH v5sub1 0/8] arm64: split linear and kernel mappings Matthias Brugger
2016-02-12 19:47   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-12 20:10     ` Matthias Brugger
2016-02-12 20:37       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-13 14:28       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-02-15 13:29         ` Matthias Brugger [this message]
2016-02-15 13:40           ` Will Deacon
2016-02-15 14:58           ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56C1D2CF.1010108@gmail.com \
    --to=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).