From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andre.przywara@arm.com (Andre Przywara) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:25:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: Introduce Allwinner SoC config option In-Reply-To: <20160218113207.5ffffee2@xhacker> References: <1455709440-8668-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <1455709440-8668-2-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20160218113207.5ffffee2@xhacker> Message-ID: <56C59BFD.20609@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 18/02/16 03:32, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > Dear Andre, > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:43:53 +0000 > Andre Przywara wrote: > >> To prepare for the Allwinner A64 SoC support, introduce a config >> option to allow compiling Allwinner (aka. sunxi) specific drivers >> for the arm64 architecture as well. >> This patch just defines the ARCH_SUNXI symbol to allow Allwinner >> specific drivers to be selected during kernel configuration. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara >> --- >> arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms >> index 8a09522..2f7f69b 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms >> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms >> @@ -1,5 +1,10 @@ >> menu "Platform selection" >> >> +config ARCH_SUNXI > > it's better to keep ARCH_YYZZ sorted in alphabetic order Right, I think I originally started with ARCH_ALLWINNER until I found ARCH_SUNXI, but forgot to move it. Actually I wonder if we should sort for the user visible config options instead, but that's another story. Cheers, Andre. > Thanks, > Jisheng > >> + bool "Allwinner sunxi 64-bit SoC Family" >> + help >> + This enables support for Allwinner sunxi based SoCs like the A64. >> + >> config ARCH_BCM_IPROC >> bool "Broadcom iProc SoC Family" >> help >