From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mika.penttila@nextfour.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Mika_Penttil=c3=a4?=) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:34:07 +0200 Subject: arm: set_memory_xx fixes patch missing? In-Reply-To: <20160222150911.GA25429@luxor.wired.org> References: <20160222150911.GA25429@luxor.wired.org> Message-ID: <56CB2A6F.5060006@nextfour.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 22.02.2016 17:09, Paolo Pisati wrote: > What's happened to the arm side of this patch: > > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1601.2/04934.html > > the arm64 code is already in Linus's tree, while it seems like the arm part was > lost and forgotten, and i don't see it in rmk's patch queue. Hi, Yes, it for sure should go in, please apply: ---------------------------------------------------- From: Mika Penttil? Allow zero size updates. This makes set_memory_xx() consistent with x86, s390 and arm64. Signed-off-by: Mika Penttil? mika.penttila at nextfour.com --- arch/arm/mm/pageattr.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/arm/mm/pageattr.c index be7fe4b..9edf6b0 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/pageattr.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/pageattr.c @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages, WARN_ON_ONCE(1); } + if (!numpages) + return 0; + if (start < MODULES_VADDR || start >= MODULES_END) return -EINVAL; -- 1.9.1