From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dinguyen@opensource.altera.com (Dinh Nguyen)
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:38:17 -0600
Subject: [PATCH v2] dts: add specific compatible type for Terasic
 DE0-NANO-SoC Board
In-Reply-To: <1595377.ZIYnBnVf5Q@virgo>
References: <8416439.76b9YNhpgR@dabox> <20160225103820.GB747@pengutronix.de>
 <56CF323C.90202@opensource.altera.com> <1595377.ZIYnBnVf5Q@virgo>
Message-ID: <56CF9069.4060505@opensource.altera.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 02/25/2016 05:34 PM, Tim Sander wrote:

> As far as i remember there are different de0 and different sockit boards, so 
> the name does not seem to be as concise? I don't care but i would say that
> de0-nano-soc is the most concise and easier to search for than atlas which
> might turn up more false postives?
> 

I'm fine with "terasic,de0-nano-soc".

Dinh