From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (Tomi Valkeinen) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 09:36:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 11/11] ARM: versatile: move CLCD configuration to device tree In-Reply-To: References: <1454594660-7532-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <3695074.sKSIyOjpjD@wuerfel> <6859810.tb1t0IEONi@wuerfel> <56CC57FC.20707@ti.com> <56CC60C4.6040908@ti.com> <56CF2FB1.106@ti.com> <56D02D28.9080109@ti.com> Message-ID: <56DD2F77.6080407@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/03/16 18:57, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >> Although one thing to consider is that if there is ever going to be a >> DRM driver for CLCD, it would be good to have the device tree parts >> correctly representing the hardware, so that the DRM driver could be >> implemented in a cleaner, more generic way. > > OK so for the next kernel cycle I can work on that. > > The non-controversial patch set is essentially just using the DT bindings Yes, I think the non-controversial series is fine. Will you be sending a v2 of that series? > that are already in the kernel and in widespread use. See: > commit d10715be03bd8bad59ddc50236cb140c3bd73c7b > "video: ARM CLCD: Add DT support" > > They follow the example set by > commit 478a4f81af4936c683a03488e15b087e28cb4f0d > "ARM: vexpress: Add CLCD Device Tree properties" This one not actually correct, as the panel node is inside the clcd node. The child parent relationship should represent a control bus. But that's a different topic... Tomi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: