From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lars.persson@axis.com (Lars Persson) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:19:45 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: artpec: update clock bindings in artpec6.dtsi In-Reply-To: <20160313001441.GD17502@localhost> References: <1456392854-13527-1-git-send-email-larper@axis.com> <20160313001441.GD17502@localhost> Message-ID: <56E67421.4030405@axis.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/13/2016 01:14 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:34:14AM +0100, Lars Persson wrote: >> The clock bindings for the main clock controller was changed to an >> indexed controller style binding on request of the clk >> maintainers. This updates the dtsi to use the new bindings. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lars Persson >> --- >> Note: This patch depends on a header file delivered through the clk tree in >> "clk: add device tree binding for Artpec-6 clock controller". > > This is a bit painful for us. It works when we get contents sent as pull > requests, since then we can share a branch with the clk header file on it. > > However, when we apply patches that's harder. > > I suggest we merge this after both trees have been picked up instead. Please > resend after that if we for some reason forget. > > > The alternative is to just use the numerical constants now, and switch to the > symbols after the merge window (or in the next release). I'm getting tempted to > propose that solution for more and more of these in the future, since it's a > somewhat annoying dependency to have (and we often have them). > > Either way, we're close to the merge window opening, so let's aim to do this > patch towards the end. Since it's a new platform, risk for regression doesn't > exist, etc. > > > -Olof > Hi So let's be flexible :) We will submit a new patch with numerical clock indexes today. - Lars