From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kernel@martin.sperl.org (Martin Sperl) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:23:45 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 04/11] ARM: bcm2835: dt: add bindings for shared interrupt properties In-Reply-To: References: <1457175142-28665-1-git-send-email-kernel@martin.sperl.org> <1457175142-28665-5-git-send-email-kernel@martin.sperl.org> <20160310085714.GA31313@svinekod> Message-ID: <56F10F21.9020709@martin.sperl.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Mark! On 11.03.2016 09:51, Martin Sperl wrote: >> On 10.03.2016, at 09:57, Mark Rutland wrote: >> >> Alternative options that have been considered: >> * there is unfortunately no ?interrupt-names? property (like it exists for >> reg, dma), because then I would have preferred to used: >> interrupts = <...>, <...>, ?; >> interrupt-name = ?dma0?, ?dma1?, ..., ?dma10?, ?dmashared?, ?dmaall?; >> with something like this we could probably have avoided both properties >> and just added a legacy mapping >> This would require some changes to the irq framework (which I wanted >> to avoid) I have posted a patch based on this approach (after having found out that it is possible with the current framework using platform_get_irq_byname). Rob Herring has "Acked" the documentation patch: [PATCH 1/3] dt/bindings: bcm2835: add interrupt-names property Is this approach acceptable for you as well, so that we can try to get it merged? Thanks, Martin