From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org (Srinivas Kandagatla)
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:30:08 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] ARM: dts: dragonboard-600c: add board support with
 serial
In-Reply-To: <56F2F78E.8050002@codeaurora.org>
References: <1458762366-9233-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
 <1458762442-9492-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
 <56F2F78E.8050002@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <56F2FCD0.1000708@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org



On 23/03/16 20:07, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/23/2016 12:47 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..e96aab6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
>> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
>> +#include "qcom-apq8064-v2.0.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +	model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. APQ8064 DragonBoard600c";
>> +	compatible = "qcom,apq8064-dragonboard600c", "qcom,apq8064";
>
> Does the bootloader look at this string at all or is it using appended
> DTB design? I'm mostly worried about having that
Not at least on APQ8064 bootloaders, as they are still missing DT 
support. Currently we append dtb to the kernel.
> qcom,apq8064-dragonboard600c part. It should probably be
> qcom,apq8064-sbc or something like that instead.
Will do that in next version.

thanks,
srini

>