From: sr@denx.de (Stefan Roese)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] spi: orion.c: Add direct access mode
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:15:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F412B5.2080200@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3250653.vvT0RgK8yg@wuerfel>
On 24.03.2016 13:42, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 24 March 2016 08:22:36 Stefan Roese wrote:
>>
>> Arnd, thanks for your comments.
>>
>> So we seem to agree, that one MBus window per SPI controller is the
>> way to go. Only how should this be described in the DT? I've come up
>> with these new DT properties in v2:
>>
>> +- da-reg : The physical memory area that will be used for the direct
>> + access mode, if enabled in one of the SPI devices.
>> +
>> +Per SPI device:
>> +- da-target-attribute : The target and attribute value for a specific
>> + SPI-controller / SPI-device combination.
>> + E.g. <0x01 0x5e>: SPI0-CS1 target and attribute
>>
>> ...
>>
>> +Example with direct access mode:
>> + spi at 10600 {
>> + compatible = "marvell,orion-spi";
>> + status = "okay";
>> + da-reg = <0xf2000000 0x100000>;
>> +
>> + spi-fpga at 1 {
>> + compatible = "altera,stratix-v";
>> + reg = <1>;
>> + /* 0x01 0x5e: SPI0-CS1 target and attribute */
>> + da-target-attribute = <0x01 0x5e>;
>> + };
>> + };
>>
>> I've added the "da-*" (Direct Access) properties to enable the
>> SPI driver to dynamically allocate the MBus windows. Do you find
>> these new bindings reasonable? Or do you have better suggestions for
>> this per-SPI-device dynamic MBus allocation, perhaps by using
>> MBUS_ID somehow?
>
> I was thinking it would be statically set up,
Really statically? Please see below.
> but then we have a
> problem with how it uses both internal-regs and and its own mbus
> based reg, so we probably have to move the spi node outside of
> the internal-regs node to achieve that, similar to how we handle
> the devbus devices:
>
>
> soc@ {
> spi0 {
> compatible = "marvell,armada-370-spi",
> "marvell,orion-spi";
> reg = <MBUS_ID(0xf0, 0x01) 0x10600 0x28>,
> <MBUS_ID(0x01, 0x5e) 0 0x100000>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> pinctrl-0 = <&spi0_pins1>;
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> cell-index = <0>;
> interrupts = <30>;
> clocks = <&coreclk 0>;
> status = "disabled";
> };
> };
Do I understand this correctly, that you suggest to list all MBus
windows here, that the SoC supports (e.g. 8 for the Armada XP).
And let the SPI driver then extract and dynamically enable (map)
the one that is currently used?
We also need a per-SPI-device DT property to enable this direct
access mode for this specific SPI device. As not all SPI devices
support this mode - at least not yet. How about this one:
flash0: flash at 0 {
compatible = "m25p128";
reg = <0>;
direct-access-enable;
...
};
?
Thanks,
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-24 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-22 16:24 [PATCH v2] spi: orion.c: Add direct access mode Stefan Roese
2016-03-22 16:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-03-22 16:44 ` Stefan Roese
2016-03-23 11:33 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-23 11:59 ` Stefan Roese
2016-03-23 12:54 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-23 13:10 ` Stefan Roese
2016-03-23 13:26 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-03-23 13:36 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-23 13:56 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-03-23 19:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-24 7:22 ` Stefan Roese
2016-03-24 12:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-24 16:15 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2016-03-24 16:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-24 17:30 ` Stefan Roese
2016-03-24 16:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-24 17:51 ` Stefan Roese
2016-03-24 20:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-25 10:32 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-25 15:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-25 15:50 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-25 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-25 22:39 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-29 12:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-29 16:47 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-29 19:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-29 19:52 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-29 20:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-29 21:00 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-29 21:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-29 21:28 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-29 22:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-05 7:11 ` Stefan Roese
2016-04-05 13:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-04-05 13:20 ` Stefan Roese
2016-04-05 13:31 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-03-23 13:27 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-23 17:25 ` Stefan Roese
2016-03-23 18:29 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-23 18:39 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-03-24 5:45 ` Stefan Roese
2016-03-24 11:23 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-24 12:05 ` Stefan Roese
2016-03-22 17:39 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56F412B5.2080200@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).