From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:53:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection In-Reply-To: <20160323134750.GC2570@piout.net> References: <1458285681-25684-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <20160318103418.GA2531@piout.net> <56F27C89.9070004@atmel.com> <20160323134750.GC2570@piout.net> Message-ID: <56FA88DF.20208@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Le 23/03/2016 14:47, Alexandre Belloni a ?crit : > On 23/03/2016 at 12:22:49 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote : >> Le 18/03/2016 11:34, Alexandre Belloni a ?crit : >>> On 18/03/2016 at 08:21:19 +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote : >>>> So far, the CIDR and EXID registers were in the DBGU interface. This device >>>> has disappeared with the SAMA5D2 family. These registers are exposed >>>> through a new device called chipid. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches >>>> [nicolas.ferre at atmel.com: remove useless warnings] >>> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni >>> >>>> --- >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt | 4 ++ >>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++----- >> >> We may need to split this patch in 2 for going through separate arm-soc >> branches: what do you think Alexandre? >> > > I think the patch can go in as it is now, the documentation being in > line with the code. Okay: patches 1 & 2 in the "soc" branch. patch 3 in the "dt" branch. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre