From: kernel@tekno-soft.it (Roberto Fichera)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] i.MX6 PCIe: Fix imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset() polarity
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 18:44:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FAB0DB.3070303@tekno-soft.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+vNU0bQVd0qyLg+09CUHx4WsrEqwZ4hLVuuvazR8DWpiHE_g@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/29/2016 06:40 PM, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Roberto Fichera <kernel@tekno-soft.it> wrote:
>> On 03/29/2016 05:10 PM, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>> Arnd,
>>>
>>> Right, on the IMX the MSI interrupt is GIC-120 which is also the
>>> legacy INTD and I do see that if I happen to put a radio in a slot
>>> where due to swizzling its pin1 becomes INTD (GIC-120) the interrupt
>>> does fire and the device works. Any other slot using GIC-123 (INTA),
>>> GIC-122 (INTB), or GIC-121 (INTC) never fires so its very possible
>>> that something in the designware core is masking out the legacy irqs.
>>> I would also think this was something IMX specific, but I really don't
>>> see any codepaths in pci-imx6.c that would cause that: a driver
>>> requesting a legacy PCI would get a GIC interrupt which is handled by
>>> the IMX6 gpc interrupt controller.
>>>
>>> Any dra7xxx, exynos, spear13xx, keystone, layerscape, hisi, qcom SoC
>>> users of designware PCIe core out there that can verify PCI MSI and
>>> legacy are both working at the same time?
>>>
>>> Lucas is the expert here and I believe he has the documentation for
>>> the designware core that Freescale doens't provide with the IMX6
>>> documentation so hopefully he can provide some insight. He's the one
>>> that has authored all the MSI support and has been using it.
>>>
>>> I typically advise our users to 'not' enable MSI because
>>> architecturally you can spread 4 distinct legacy irq's across CPU's
>>> better than a single shared irq.
>> Don't know if I'm facing similar problem, however devices connected in miniPCI slot behind
>> a PCIe-to-PCI bridge (MSI is disabled) using INTA all is working ok, including shared IRQ.
>> In case of INTB will not work, and the GIC irq quite often get stuck.
>>
> Roberto,
>
> What board/platform is this and what does /proc/interrupts look like?
It's a custom board
root at voneus-janas-imx6q:~# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
16: 936 637 2057 938 GIC 29 Edge twd
17: 0 0 0 0 GPC 55 Level i.MX Timer Tick
22: 247 0 0 0 GPC 26 Level 2020000.serial
34: 0 0 0 0 gpio-mxc 6 Edge Factory Reset Button
267: 0 0 0 0 GPC 49 Level imx_thermal
272: 0 0 0 0 GPC 19 Level rtc alarm
278: 0 0 0 0 GPC 2 Level sdma
281: 361 0 0 0 GIC 150 Level 2188000.ethernet
282: 0 0 0 0 GIC 151 Level 2188000.ethernet
283: 2882 0 0 0 GPC 25 Level mmc0
284: 95 0 0 0 GPC 37 Level 21a4000.i2c
290: 36546 0 0 0 GPC 123 Level PCIe PME, b4xxp
291: 2 0 0 0 GIC 137 Level 2101000.jr0
292: 0 0 0 0 GIC 138 Level 2102000.jr1
IPI0: 0 0 0 0 CPU wakeup interrupts
IPI1: 0 0 0 0 Timer broadcast interrupts
IPI2: 1642 1038 1626 1781 Rescheduling interrupts
IPI3: 95 95 122 119 Function call interrupts
IPI4: 3 0 2 0 Single function call interrupts
IPI5: 0 0 0 0 CPU stop interrupts
IPI6: 0 0 0 0 IRQ work interrupts
IPI7: 0 0 0 0 completion interrupts
Err: 0
>
> This sounds like what would happen if the downstream interrupts on the
> PCIe-to-PCI bridge are not mapped properly as was the case with a
> board I support (in which case I had to work out a bootloader fixup
> that placed a non-standard interrupt-map in the device-tree for the
> bridge). What bridge are you using?
PCIe-to-PCI bridge is a Ti XIO2001 where we are using INTA/B only wired 1:1
>
> Tim
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-29 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-25 13:32 [PATCH] i.MX6 PCIe: Fix imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset() polarity Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-27 14:44 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-03-28 0:26 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-03-28 19:59 ` Tim Harvey
2016-03-28 20:13 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-03-28 20:42 ` Tim Harvey
2016-03-28 21:30 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-03-28 22:06 ` Tim Harvey
2016-03-28 22:13 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-03-29 5:40 ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-29 5:43 ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-29 5:29 ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-29 8:55 ` Lucas Stach
2016-03-29 10:39 ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-29 10:55 ` Lucas Stach
2016-03-29 13:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-29 13:32 ` Tim Harvey
2016-03-29 13:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-29 14:29 ` Tim Harvey
2016-03-29 14:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-29 15:10 ` Tim Harvey
2016-03-29 15:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-29 17:38 ` Tim Harvey
2016-03-29 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-29 17:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-03-29 16:13 ` Roberto Fichera
2016-03-29 16:40 ` Tim Harvey
2016-03-29 16:44 ` Roberto Fichera [this message]
2016-03-29 17:31 ` Tim Harvey
2016-03-30 8:00 ` Roberto Fichera
2016-03-30 10:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-30 12:50 ` Roberto Fichera
2016-03-30 13:38 ` Tim Harvey
2016-03-30 15:20 ` Roberto Fichera
2016-03-30 8:10 ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-31 16:19 ` Tim Harvey
2016-04-04 10:37 ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-29 14:14 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-03-29 5:21 ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-30 12:06 ` Petr Štetiar
2016-03-30 12:45 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-03-30 14:38 ` Marcel Ziswiler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56FAB0DB.3070303@tekno-soft.it \
--to=kernel@tekno-soft.it \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).