From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: vz@mleia.com (Vladimir Zapolskiy)
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 20:03:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH for v4.7] arm: lpc32xx: remove leftovers of legacy clock
 source and provider drivers
In-Reply-To: <1459784558.25564.6.camel@localhost>
References: <1456973180-31764-1-git-send-email-vz@mleia.com>
 <1459784558.25564.6.camel@localhost>
Message-ID: <57029E6F.5050300@mleia.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Sylvain,

On 04.04.2016 18:42, Sylvain Lemieux wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
> 
> On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 04:46 +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> After switching the platform to common clock framework there is no
>> more need to keep dead code in arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx, which glued
>> legacy clock source and clock provider drivers, remove the leftovers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/common.c | 95 ------------------------------------------
>>  arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/common.h | 23 +---------
>>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 117 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/common.h
>> index 1cd8853..f03683f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/common.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/common.h
>> @@ -19,38 +19,17 @@
>>  
>>  #include <linux/reboot.h>
>>  
> It is possible to remove "reboot.h";
> do you want me to send a separate patch for it?

I assume that removing of this #include entry is independent from my patch,
and related to gone lpc32xx_restart, please send a fixup on top of v4.6-r1.

>>  extern void lpc23xx_restart(enum reboot_mode, const char *);
>>  
> The patch does not apply on 4.6-rc1;
> can you send a version 2 of your patch based on the latest mainline?
>

Right, the change requires a rebase, I'll send v2 shortly.

Thanks!

--
With best wishes,
Vladimir