From: eric.auger@linaro.org (Eric Auger)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/7] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64: kernel part 1/3: iommu changes
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:28:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5706528B.2010906@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160406171534.794c6824@t450s.home>
Hi Alex,
On 04/07/2016 01:15 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:06:55 +0000
> Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> This series introduces the dma-reserved-iommu api used to:
>> - create/destroy an iova domain dedicated to reserved iova bindings
>> - map/unmap physical addresses onto reserved IOVAs.
>> - unmap and destroy all IOVA reserved bindings
>
> Why are we making the decision to have an unbalanced map vs unmap, we
> can create individual mappings, but only unmap the whole thing and
> start over? That's a strange interface. Thanks,
The "individual" balanced unmap also exists (iommu_put_reserved_iova)
and this is the "normal" path. This happens on msi_domain_deactivate
(and possibly on msi_domain_set_affinity).
I added iommu_unmap_reserved to handle the case where the userspace
registers a reserved iova domain and fails to unregister it. In that
case one need to handle the cleanup on kernel-side and I chose to
implement this on vfio_iommu_type1 release. All the reserved IOMMU
bindings get destroyed on that event.
Any advice to handle this situation?
Best Regards
Eric
>
> Alex
>
>> Currently reserved IOVAs are meant to map MSI physical doorbells. A single
>> reserved domain does exit per domain.
>>
>> Also a new domain attribute is introduced to signal whether the MSI
>> addresses must be mapped in the IOMMU
>>
>> VFIO subsystem is supposed to create/destroy the iommu reserved domain.
>>
>> When the MSI sub-system is about to handle an MSI physical address
>> that needs to be bound, it uses the dma-reserved_iommu API to map/unmap
>> the address. Since several drivers are likely to use the same doorbell,
>> a reference counting must exist on the bindings. An RB-tree indexed by PA
>> is used.
>>
>> More details & context can be found at:
>> http://www.linaro.org/blog/core-dump/kvm-pciemsi-passthrough-armarm64/
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> Git: complete series available at
>> https://git.linaro.org/people/eric.auger/linux.git/shortlog/refs/heads/v4.6-rc1-pcie-passthrough-v6
>>
>> History:
>>
>> RFC v5 -> patch v6:
>> - split to ease the review process
>> - in dma-reserved-api use a spin lock instead of a mutex (reported by
>> Jean-Philippe)
>> - revisit iommu_get_reserved_iova API to pass a size parameter upon
>> Marc's request
>> - Consistently use the page order passed when creating the iova domain.
>> - init reserved_binding_list (reported by Julien)
>>
>> RFC v4 -> RFC v5:
>> - take into account Thomas' comments on MSI related patches
>> - split "msi: IOMMU map the doorbell address when needed"
>> - increase readability and add comments
>> - fix style issues
>> - split "iommu: Add DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING attribute"
>> - platform ITS now advertises IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP
>> - fix compilation issue with CONFIG_IOMMU API unset
>> - arm-smmu-v3 now advertises DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING
>>
>> RFC v3 -> v4:
>> - Move doorbell mapping/unmapping in msi.c
>> - fix ref count issue on set_affinity: in case of a change in the address
>> the previous address is decremented
>> - doorbell map/unmap now is done on msi composition. Should allow the use
>> case for platform MSI controllers
>> - create dma-reserved-iommu.h/c exposing/implementing a new API dedicated
>> to reserved IOVA management (looking like dma-iommu glue)
>> - series reordering to ease the review:
>> - first part is related to IOMMU
>> - second related to MSI sub-system
>> - third related to VFIO (except arm-smmu IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP removal)
>> - expose the number of requested IOVA pages through VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO
>> [this partially addresses Marc's comments on iommu_get/put_single_reserved
>> size/alignment problematic - which I did not ignore - but I don't know
>> how much I can do at the moment]
>>
>> RFC v2 -> RFC v3:
>> - should fix wrong handling of some CONFIG combinations:
>> CONFIG_IOVA, CONFIG_IOMMU_API, CONFIG_PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
>> - fix MSI_FLAG_IRQ_REMAPPING setting in GICv3 ITS (although not tested)
>>
>> PATCH v1 -> RFC v2:
>> - reverted to RFC since it looks more reasonable ;-) the code is split
>> between VFIO, IOMMU, MSI controller and I am not sure I did the right
>> choices. Also API need to be further discussed.
>> - iova API usage in arm-smmu.c.
>> - MSI controller natively programs the MSI addr with either the PA or IOVA.
>> This is not done anymore in vfio-pci driver as suggested by Alex.
>> - check irq remapping capability of the group
>>
>> RFC v1 [2] -> PATCH v1:
>> - use the existing dma map/unmap ioctl interface with a flag to register a
>> reserved IOVA range. Use the legacy Rb to store this special vfio_dma.
>> - a single reserved IOVA contiguous region now is allowed
>> - use of an RB tree indexed by PA to store allocated reserved slots
>> - use of a vfio_domain iova_domain to manage iova allocation within the
>> window provided by the userspace
>> - vfio alloc_map/unmap_free take a vfio_group handle
>> - vfio_group handle is cached in vfio_pci_device
>> - add ref counting to bindings
>> - user modality enabled at the end of the series
>>
>>
>> Eric Auger (7):
>> iommu: Add DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING attribute
>> iommu/arm-smmu: advertise DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING attribute
>> iommu: introduce a reserved iova cookie
>> dma-reserved-iommu: alloc/free_reserved_iova_domain
>> dma-reserved-iommu: reserved binding rb-tree and helpers
>> dma-reserved-iommu: iommu_get/put_single_reserved
>> dma-reserved-iommu: iommu_unmap_reserved
>>
>> drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 8 +
>> drivers/iommu/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 2 +
>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 2 +
>> drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c | 321 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 2 +
>> include/linux/dma-reserved-iommu.h | 80 +++++++++
>> include/linux/iommu.h | 7 +
>> 8 files changed, 423 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/dma-reserved-iommu.h
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-07 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-04 8:06 [PATCH v6 0/7] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64: kernel part 1/3: iommu changes Eric Auger
2016-04-04 8:06 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] iommu: Add DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING attribute Eric Auger
2016-04-04 8:06 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] iommu/arm-smmu: advertise " Eric Auger
2016-04-04 8:06 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] iommu: introduce a reserved iova cookie Eric Auger
2016-04-04 8:06 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] dma-reserved-iommu: alloc/free_reserved_iova_domain Eric Auger
2016-04-06 23:00 ` Alex Williamson
2016-04-07 9:33 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-04 8:07 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] dma-reserved-iommu: reserved binding rb-tree and helpers Eric Auger
2016-04-04 8:07 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] dma-reserved-iommu: iommu_get/put_single_reserved Eric Auger
2016-04-06 23:12 ` Alex Williamson
2016-04-07 9:33 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-07 14:38 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2016-04-07 16:44 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-04 8:07 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] dma-reserved-iommu: iommu_unmap_reserved Eric Auger
2016-04-06 23:15 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64: kernel part 1/3: iommu changes Alex Williamson
2016-04-07 12:28 ` Eric Auger [this message]
2016-04-07 17:50 ` Alex Williamson
2016-04-08 13:31 ` Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5706528B.2010906@linaro.org \
--to=eric.auger@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).