From: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K Poulose)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: Verify CPU errata work arounds on hotplugged CPU
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:41:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5714E401.1090000@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160415141242.GM22906@arm.com>
On 15/04/16 15:12, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 03:10:27PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> On 14/04/16 18:49, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>> On 14/04/16 18:39, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 12:24:13PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>>>> CPU Errata work arounds are detected and applied to the
>>>>> kernel code at boot time and the data is then freed up.
>>>>> If a new hotplugged CPU requires a work around which
>>>>> was not applied at boot time, there is nothing we can
>>>>> do but simply fail the booting.
>>>>
>>>> Hmm, wouldn't it be better not to free the alternative text for errata
>>>> workarounds instead?
>>>
>>> We could. I don't have a strong opinion. If there are no objections, I could
>>> adopt it.
>>
>> The alternatives have been merged to .init by :
>>
>> commit 9aa4ec1571da6236 ("arm64: mm: fold alternatives into .init")
>>
>> Mark,
>>
>> Do you have any concerns on applying alternatives for CPUs turned online later ?
>> We have to revert the patch above to get going
>
> Well, note that I'm only suggesting that we keep the alternatives for
> CPU errata workarounds.
So to confirmt, do you mean for now we could do :
- Not release the alternatives for errata work arounds.
- And retain the check for new erratas, failing the CPUs.
And in a follow up series,
- Add support for applying errata work arounds later, as we find
a new CPU which requires it
- and remove the constraint above ?
Suzuki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-18 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-06 11:24 [PATCH 0/5] arm64: Fix behavior of maxcpus=n Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64: cpufeature: Add scope for capability check Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-14 17:38 ` Will Deacon
2016-04-14 17:47 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-15 12:55 ` Will Deacon
2016-04-15 13:26 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: Allow a capability to be checked on a single CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] irqchip/gic: Restore CPU interface checking Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: Verify CPU errata work arounds on hotplugged CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-14 17:39 ` Will Deacon
2016-04-14 17:49 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-15 14:10 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-15 14:12 ` Will Deacon
2016-04-18 13:41 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2016-04-06 11:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: Fix behavior of maxcpus=N Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-07 9:18 ` James Morse
2016-04-07 9:26 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-07 10:07 ` [UPDATED] " Suzuki K Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5714E401.1090000@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).