From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tn@semihalf.com (Tomasz Nowicki) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 17:26:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH V6 00/13] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller In-Reply-To: <4253385.YPSgBqNLfg@wuerfel> References: <1460740008-19489-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> <5714E224.1030307@semihalf.com> <4253385.YPSgBqNLfg@wuerfel> Message-ID: <5714FC89.8060005@semihalf.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 18.04.2016 16:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 18 April 2016 15:33:24 Tomasz Nowicki wrote: >> >> Of course we can split discussion into the two topics: >> 1. ECAM based ACPI host controller - patches [1-10] >> 2. Quirks handling and examples. >> >> IMO, it is very helpful for reviewers to go with one unified patch set >> and see the whole picture. Also, as you can see, quirks handling allows >> people to test it easily with their servers (not only QEMU but real HW). > > I think splitting the two would help tremendously. The regular > PCI support should just get merged (it should have been completed > years ago when ACPI for ARM64 was first implemented), while the quirks > handling contains all ugly nonstandard hacks we have to be careful > about. > OK, so for those who want to review just "ECAM based ACPI host controller" lets consider only patches [1-10]. Patches 11-13 are well isolated and do not affect previous one. Is that ok for this series? Thanks, Tomasz