linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vz@mleia.com (Vladimir Zapolskiy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] arm: dts: lpc32xx: update ssp / spi nodes
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 02:12:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <571569F8.3030905@mleia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461014548.27294.10.camel@localhost>

Hi Sylvain,

On 19.04.2016 00:22, Sylvain Lemieux wrote:
> Hi Vladimir and Arnd,
> 
> On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 07:45 +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> On 16.04.2016 22:34, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Thursday 14 April 2016 08:20:34 slemieux.tyco at gmail.com wrote:
>>>> From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux@tycoint.com>
>>>>
> ...
>>>>
>>> The patches look fine, but it's unclear what you want to happen with them
>>> as long as the maintainer situation is not resolved. I've seen patches
>>> from Vladimir and you recently, and none from Roland, so I think it would
>>> be good if one or both of you could officially step up to be maintainers
>>> and collect all patches to forward them to arm at kernel.org for inclusion.
>>
>> for v4.5 and v4.6 I collected my own patches from LAKML after review,
>> I started to do it for v4.7, but probably a bit later than desired.
>>
> Vladimir, would it be possible for you to add my change, after review 
> is done on LAKML, for the lpc32xx pull request you will do for 4.7?

definitely.

For your information I updated my tree https://github.com/vzapolskiy/linux.git
recently, for DTS changes you may want to rebase the changeset on top of
lpc32xx/dt branch.

By the way I plan to rename board DTS files to match lpc32*-*.dts pattern,
but I can postpone doing it until your changes are included.

>>> Once we have an agreement on who does this, please send a patch to
>>> update the MAINTAINERS file.
>>
>> I'll send a change on behalf of myself, at this point I don't think that
>> pure lpc32xx maintenance (deliberately here I exclude development!) task
>> takes more than 20 hours per month, which is affordable for me,
>> Sylvain please express your view.
>>
> I can provide support for pure lpc32xx maintenance task 
> (I also exclude development); I can free up to 10-15 hours a
> month for doing testing and patch review.

Sounds good, thank you. Do you want to take over maintenance on v4.8
cycle?

> Is there any documentation available on the process 
> to submit a merge request to the mailing list?
> 
> ...

As for me I thoroughly observe what other ARM SoC maintainers do, and
ask questions if something remains uncertain.

--
With best wishes,
Vladimir

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-18 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-14 12:20 [PATCH 0/3] arm: dts: lpc32xx: update ssp / spi nodes slemieux.tyco at gmail.com
2016-04-14 12:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm: dts: lpc32xx: add clock properties to " slemieux.tyco at gmail.com
2016-04-18  2:39   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-04-18 18:41     ` Sylvain Lemieux
2016-04-14 12:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm: dts: lpc32xx: disabled ssp0/spi1 & ssp1/spi2 by default slemieux.tyco at gmail.com
2016-04-14 12:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm: dts: phy3250: enable ssp0 slemieux.tyco at gmail.com
2016-04-18  2:47   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-04-18 18:34     ` Sylvain Lemieux
2016-04-16 19:34 ` [PATCH 0/3] arm: dts: lpc32xx: update ssp / spi nodes Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18  4:45   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-04-18 15:03     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 21:22     ` Sylvain Lemieux
2016-04-18 21:52       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-20 13:28         ` Sylvain Lemieux
2016-04-21  2:19           ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-04-21  9:59             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 23:12       ` Vladimir Zapolskiy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=571569F8.3030905@mleia.com \
    --to=vz@mleia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).