linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: eric.auger@linaro.org (Eric Auger)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 05/10] iommu/dma-reserved-iommu: reserved binding rb-tree and helpers
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:18:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5717ABF2.1030204@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5717805A.3070602@arm.com>

Robin,
On 04/20/2016 03:12 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 19/04/16 17:56, Eric Auger wrote:
>> we will need to track which host physical addresses are mapped to
>> reserved IOVA. In that prospect we introduce a new RB tree indexed
>> by physical address. This RB tree only is used for reserved IOVA
>> bindings.
>>
>> It is expected this RB tree will contain very few bindings.
> 
> Sounds like a good reason in favour of using a list, and thus having
> rather less code here ;)

OK will move to a simple list.
> 
>>  Those
>> generally correspond to single page mapping one MSI frame (GICv2m
>> frame or ITS GITS_TRANSLATER frame).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
>>
>> ---
>> v5 -> v6:
>> - add comment about @d->reserved_lock to be held
>>
>> v3 -> v4:
>> - that code was formerly in "iommu/arm-smmu: add a reserved binding RB
>> tree"
>> ---
>>   drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c | 63
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c
>> b/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c
>> index 2562af0..f6fa18e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,69 @@ struct reserved_iova_domain {
>>       int prot; /* iommu protection attributes to be obeyed */
>>   };
>>
>> +struct iommu_reserved_binding {
>> +    struct kref        kref;
>> +    struct rb_node        node;
>> +    struct iommu_domain    *domain;
> 
> Hang on, the tree these are in is already embedded in a domain. Ergo we
> can't look them up without first knowing the domain they belong to, so
> what purpose does this guy serve?
this is used on the kref_put. The release function takes a kref; then we
get the container to retrieve the binding and storing the domain here
enables to unlink the node.

Best Regards

Eric
> 
> Robin.
> 
>> +    phys_addr_t        addr;
>> +    dma_addr_t        iova;
>> +    size_t            size;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Reserved binding RB-tree manipulation */
>> +
>> +/* @d->reserved_lock must be held */
>> +static struct iommu_reserved_binding *find_reserved_binding(
>> +                    struct iommu_domain *d,
>> +                    phys_addr_t start, size_t size)
>> +{
>> +    struct rb_node *node = d->reserved_binding_list.rb_node;
>> +
>> +    while (node) {
>> +        struct iommu_reserved_binding *binding =
>> +            rb_entry(node, struct iommu_reserved_binding, node);
>> +
>> +        if (start + size <= binding->addr)
>> +            node = node->rb_left;
>> +        else if (start >= binding->addr + binding->size)
>> +            node = node->rb_right;
>> +        else
>> +            return binding;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* @d->reserved_lock must be held */
>> +static void link_reserved_binding(struct iommu_domain *d,
>> +                  struct iommu_reserved_binding *new)
>> +{
>> +    struct rb_node **link = &d->reserved_binding_list.rb_node;
>> +    struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
>> +    struct iommu_reserved_binding *binding;
>> +
>> +    while (*link) {
>> +        parent = *link;
>> +        binding = rb_entry(parent, struct iommu_reserved_binding,
>> +                   node);
>> +
>> +        if (new->addr + new->size <= binding->addr)
>> +            link = &(*link)->rb_left;
>> +        else
>> +            link = &(*link)->rb_right;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    rb_link_node(&new->node, parent, link);
>> +    rb_insert_color(&new->node, &d->reserved_binding_list);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* @d->reserved_lock must be held */
>> +static void unlink_reserved_binding(struct iommu_domain *d,
>> +                    struct iommu_reserved_binding *old)
>> +{
>> +    rb_erase(&old->node, &d->reserved_binding_list);
>> +}
>> +
>>   int iommu_alloc_reserved_iova_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>>                        dma_addr_t iova, size_t size, int prot,
>>                        unsigned long order)
>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-20 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-19 16:56 [PATCH v7 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64: kernel part 1/3: iommu changes Eric Auger
2016-04-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] iommu: Add DOMAIN_ATTR_MSI_MAPPING attribute Eric Auger
2016-04-20 12:47   ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-20 15:58     ` Eric Auger
2016-04-22 11:31       ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-22 12:00         ` Eric Auger
2016-04-22 14:49           ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-22 15:33             ` Eric Auger
2016-04-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] iommu/arm-smmu: advertise " Eric Auger
2016-04-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] iommu: introduce a reserved iova cookie Eric Auger
2016-04-20 12:55   ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-20 16:14     ` Eric Auger
2016-04-22 12:36       ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-22 13:02         ` Eric Auger
2016-04-22 14:53           ` Eric Auger
2016-04-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] iommu/dma-reserved-iommu: alloc/free_reserved_iova_domain Eric Auger
2016-04-20 13:03   ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-20 13:11     ` Eric Auger
2016-04-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] iommu/dma-reserved-iommu: reserved binding rb-tree and helpers Eric Auger
2016-04-20 13:12   ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-20 16:18     ` Eric Auger [this message]
2016-04-22 13:05       ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] iommu/dma-reserved-iommu: iommu_get/put_reserved_iova Eric Auger
2016-04-20 16:58   ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-21  8:43     ` Eric Auger
2016-04-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] iommu/dma-reserved-iommu: delete bindings in iommu_free_reserved_iova_domain Eric Auger
2016-04-20 17:05   ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-21  8:40     ` Eric Auger
2016-04-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] iommu/dma-reserved_iommu: iommu_msi_mapping_desc_to_domain Eric Auger
2016-04-20 17:19   ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-21  8:40     ` Eric Auger
2016-04-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] iommu/dma-reserved-iommu: iommu_msi_mapping_translate_msg Eric Auger
2016-04-20  9:38   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-04-20 12:50     ` Eric Auger
2016-04-20 17:28   ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-21  8:40     ` Eric Auger
2016-04-19 16:56 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] iommu/arm-smmu: call iommu_free_reserved_iova_domain on domain destruction Eric Auger
2016-04-20 17:35   ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-21  8:39     ` Eric Auger
2016-04-21 12:18 ` [PATCH v7 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64: kernel part 1/3: iommu changes Eric Auger
2016-04-21 19:32   ` Alex Williamson
2016-04-22 12:31     ` Eric Auger
2016-04-22 19:07       ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5717ABF2.1030204@linaro.org \
    --to=eric.auger@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).