From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier) Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 16:37:53 +0100 Subject: [PULL 00/29] KVM/ARM Changes for v4.7 In-Reply-To: <57334E72.9010109@redhat.com> References: <1462973422-10021-1-git-send-email-christoffer.dall@linaro.org> <57334E72.9010109@redhat.com> Message-ID: <573351D1.4060303@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/05/16 16:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 11/05/2016 15:29, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> Hi Paolo and Radim, >> >> Here is the initial set of changes for KVM/ARM for v4.7. >> >> Sorry I'm a bit late with these, but we were trying to get the new vgic >> implementation in as part of this, but I have decided to send this pull >> request now, and we can follow up with another for the new VGIC, >> assuming we feel like we have that in place in a few days. > > Don't worry, you're not late at all. I've pulled this to kvm/queue. > >> There are a few changes in this pull request touching things outside >> KVM, but they should all carry the necessary acks and it made the >> merge process much easier to do it this way. > > The following are properly acked: > > arm64: Reuse TCR field definitions for EL1 and EL2 > arm64: Introduce pmd_thp_or_huge > > I wouldn't have minded more explicit Acked-bys for the following: > > irqchip/gic-v2: Gather ACPI specific data in a single structure > irqchip/gic-v2: Parse and export virtual GIC information > irqchip/gic-v3: Prefix all pr_* messages by "GICv3: " > irqchip/gic-v3: Gather all ACPI specific data in a single structure > irqchip/gic-v3: Parse and export virtual GIC information > > I guess it's fine since Marc Zyngier is maintainer for both KVM and > irqchip, still it's never wrong to get more acks. :) Ah, I really thought I acked them. The email must have been stuck in my head... So more formally and for documentation purposes: Acked-by: Marc Zyngier Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...