From: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K Poulose)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] coresight: Fix csdev connections initialisation
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 10:30:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <574EAB3A.6040303@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANLsYkzQJVY3CDC7D9_Miw3Lu7iqV-6ABsVbTUCpivc-R0WB+Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 31/05/16 18:55, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On 31 May 2016 at 05:57, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:
>> This is a cleanup patch.
>>
>> coresight_device->conns holds an array to point to the devices
>> connected to the OUT ports of a component. Sinks, e.g ETR, do not
>> have an OUT port (nr_outport = 0), as it streams the trace to
>> memory via AXI.
>>
>> At coresight_register() we do :
>>
>> conns = kcalloc(csdev->nr_outport, sizeof(*conns), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!conns) {
>> ret = -ENOMEM;
>> goto err_kzalloc_conns;
>> }
>>
>> For ETR, since the total size requested for kcalloc is zero, the return value is,
>> ZERO_SIZE_PTR ( != NULL). Hence, csdev->conns = ZERO_SIZE_PTR which cannot be
>> verified later to contain a valid pointer. The code which accesses the csdev->conns
>> is bounded by the csdev->nr_outport check, hence we don't try to dereference the
>> ZERO_SIZE_PTR. This patch cleans up the csdev->conns and csdev->refcnt, initialisation
>> to make sure we initialise it properly(i.e, either NULL or valid conns array).
>>
>> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c
>> index 0fdaaf4..8410420 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c
>> @@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ struct coresight_device *coresight_register(struct coresight_desc *desc)
>> int nr_refcnts = 1;
>> atomic_t *refcnts = NULL;
>> struct coresight_device *csdev;
>> - struct coresight_connection *conns;
>> + struct coresight_connection *conns = NULL;
>>
>> csdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*csdev), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!csdev) {
>> @@ -908,29 +908,35 @@ struct coresight_device *coresight_register(struct coresight_desc *desc)
>> nr_refcnts = desc->pdata->nr_outport;
>> }
>>
>> - refcnts = kcalloc(nr_refcnts, sizeof(*refcnts), GFP_KERNEL);
>> - if (!refcnts) {
>> - ret = -ENOMEM;
>> - goto err_kzalloc_refcnts;
>> - }
>> + if (nr_refcnts) {
>
> Did you manage to find a usecase where "nr_refcnts == 0" ? Since
> components have at least one port this condition will always be true.
No, I didn't find one. While I was fixing the nr_outport, I thought it would
be good to check the refcnts as well.
>>
>> - csdev->conns = conns;
>> + for (i = 0; i < csdev->nr_outport; i++) {
>> + conns[i].outport = desc->pdata->outports[i];
>> + conns[i].child_name = desc->pdata->child_names[i];
>> + conns[i].child_port = desc->pdata->child_ports[i];
>> + }
>> +
>> + csdev->conns = conns;
>
> The purpose of your patch is to correctly initialise csdev->conns to
> NULL if there is no output port to speak of. As such shouldn't the
> above statement be out of the if (csdev->nr_outport) {} ?.
Not necessarily. We do a kzalloc() for csdev, which implies csdev->conns
is already NULL. I can move the code to make that explicit assignment.
>
> I'm also getting a couple of checkpatch.pl warnings on this patch.
I can fix those warnings. I ignored them initially, as it was for the length of the comment.
Cheers
Suzuki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-01 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-31 11:57 [PATCH 0/5] coresight: Miscellaneous fixes Suzuki K Poulose
2016-05-31 11:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] coresight: Fix NULL pointer dereference in _coresight_build_path Suzuki K Poulose
2016-05-31 17:39 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-05-31 11:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] coresight: etmv4: Fix ETMv4x peripheral ID table Suzuki K Poulose
2016-05-31 17:45 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-05-31 11:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] coresight: Fix csdev connections initialisation Suzuki K Poulose
2016-05-31 17:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-06-01 9:30 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2016-05-31 11:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] coresight: Add better messages for coresight_timeout Suzuki K Poulose
2016-05-31 17:57 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-05-31 17:58 ` Joe Perches
2016-06-01 9:34 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-06-01 15:15 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-05-31 11:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] coresight: Cleanup TMC status check Suzuki K Poulose
2016-05-31 18:01 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=574EAB3A.6040303@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).