linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: j.anaszewski@samsung.com (Jacek Anaszewski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/6] mfd: max8997: Use regmap to access registers
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 09:08:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <574FDB86.2070107@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <574FB967.7090201@samsung.com>

On 06/02/2016 06:43 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/01/2016 01:37 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> One thing drew my attention while reviewing this again:
>> max8997_led_brightness_set() can sleep, but the brightness_set
>> op it is assigned to must not sleep. At the time when this driver was
>> merged we were delegating brightness setting to workqueues task
>> in LED class drivers that can sleep during this call.
>> This must have been overlooked, which is even more likely, taking into
>> account that the initial patch doesn't have LED maintainer's ack.
>>
>> The non-sleeping requirement is motivated by the fact that brightness
>> can be set from softirq context, e.g. when timer trigger is enabled.
>>
>> Currently LED class drivers don't have to use workqueue on their own,
>> but are required to use brightness_set_blocking op instead of
>> brightness_set if they can sleep while setting brightness.
>>
>> Apart of that, I think that operations in max8997_led_brightness_set()
>> should be protected with mutex to assure leaving the device in
>> a consistent state in case of concurrent calls.
>>
>> I am aware that this is out of this patch scope, but I'd be grateful
>> if you could apply those changes and test them on hardware if you have
>> an access to.
>
> The problem you mention existed before the patch. It was using sleeping
> primitives (mutex) before adding regmap so I understand you don't have
> anything against this patch, right?

Right, I just wanted to indicate the problem. The patch itself is ok.

> I can fix the issue but it will be a little bit trickier because I don't
> have the hardware. Other guys in the team tested the patchset for me so
> I rely on them in that matter. Anyway I'll work on it.

Ack.

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-02  7:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1464773339-756-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
2016-06-01  9:53 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] mfd: max8997: Use regmap to access registers Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-01  9:53   ` [PATCH v7 2/6] mfd: max8997: handle IRQs using regmap Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-01  9:53   ` [PATCH v7 3/6] mfd: max8997: Change irq names to upper case Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-01  9:53   ` [PATCH v7 4/6] extcon: max8997: Fix handling error code of regmap_irq_get_virq() Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-01  9:54   ` [PATCH v7 5/6] rtc: max8997: Check for ERRNO " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-01  9:54   ` [PATCH v7 6/6] extcon: max8997: Fix inconsistent indenting Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-01 11:37   ` [PATCH v7 1/6] mfd: max8997: Use regmap to access registers Jacek Anaszewski
2016-06-02  4:43     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-02  7:08       ` Jacek Anaszewski [this message]
2016-06-08 14:26   ` Lee Jones
2016-06-08 14:30     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-16 15:07       ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=574FDB86.2070107@samsung.com \
    --to=j.anaszewski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).