From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] drivers: psci: refactor psci_cpu_init_idle in preparation for ACPI LPI support
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 15:26:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57597C92.3000609@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160609132408.GA16831@red-moon>
On 09/06/16 14:24, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:30:11PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Inorder to accomodate bot DT and ACPI LPI support in psci_cpu_init_idle,
>> move the device tree specific into psci_dt_cpu_init_idle.
>>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/firmware/psci.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
>> index 11bfee8b79a9..af6c5c839568 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
>> @@ -250,11 +250,11 @@ static int __init psci_features(u32 psci_func_id)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
>> static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u32 *, psci_power_state);
>>
>> -static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
>> +static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu)
>
> Unfortunately you would break ARM 32-bit if you did that.
>
Ah right, I failed to catch this. Thanks for spotting this.
[...]
>> int psci_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu)
>> {
>> - struct device_node *cpu_node;
>> - int ret;
>> -
>> - cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
>> - if (!cpu_node)
>> - return -ENODEV;
>> -
>> - ret = psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(cpu_node, cpu);
>> -
>> - of_node_put(cpu_node);
>> -
>> - return ret;
>> + return psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(cpu);
>
> How about leaving code as is and you wrap the cpu_node retrieval:
>
> if (!acpi_disabled) {
> acpi_idle_init();
> } else {
> cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> if (!cpu_node)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> ret = psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(cpu_node, cpu);
>
> of_node_put(cpu_node);
> }
>
> ?
>
> Alternatively, you could create an intermediate stub
> __psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(), that will be used for CONFIG_ARM
> cpuidle_ops.init and psci_dt_cpu_init_idle() after retrieving
> the cpu_node, which I think is slightly cleaner.
>
I like this approach more.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-09 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-19 12:30 [PATCH v4 0/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add ACPI v6.0 LPI support Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] ACPI / processor_idle: introduce ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:49 ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-19 13:00 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-20 9:56 ` Vikas Sajjan
2016-04-20 10:09 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-05-10 0:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 15:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states Sudeep Holla
2016-05-10 0:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 0:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 15:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-05-11 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-19 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] drivers: psci: refactor psci_cpu_init_idle in preparation for ACPI LPI support Sudeep Holla
2016-06-09 13:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-09 14:26 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2016-04-19 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI) Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 13:59 ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-19 15:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-20 9:59 ` Vikas Sajjan
2016-04-20 10:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-20 10:39 ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-04-26 15:51 ` Prakash, Prashanth
2016-04-26 16:01 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-05-11 0:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 15:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ACPI : enable ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE on ARM64 Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57597C92.3000609@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).