From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:34:50 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/5] clk: Combine DT binding doc for max77686 and max77802 In-Reply-To: References: <1466000018-16784-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1466000018-16784-3-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <576272BA.50800@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06/15/2016 05:19 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Remove the separate DT binding document file for maxim,max77802 and >> move all information to maxim,max77686 DT binding document. >> > > Now, I wonder if this is the correct approach. A system integrator is > probably going to search for the bindings of the chip that is present > in their system. For example there are different DT bindings docs for > both the max77686 and max77802 PMIC even when support is implemented > by the same driver (drivers/mfd/max77686.c). > > But maybe I'm wrong so I'll let people with more DT experience to say > if merging the bindings docs in a single one is the correct approach. I personally prefer having one binding document for all devices because essentially it is almost the same device. For looking up I use git grep with compatible string (or device name) so it does not matter, IMHO. Best regards, Krzysztof