From: dave.long@linaro.org (David Long)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v13 09/10] arm64: Add kernel return probes support (kretprobes)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:16:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <576AD5F9.9090905@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160607192836.20d94e0838ef72ebc729a054@kernel.org>
On 06/07/2016 06:28 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 23:26:23 -0400
> David Long <dave.long@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>
>>
>> The pre-handler of this special 'trampoline' kprobe executes the return
>> probe handler functions and restores original return address in ELR_EL1.
>> This way the saved pt_regs still hold the original register context to be
>> carried back to the probed kernel function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> index 5496b75..47989eb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ config ARM64
>> select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE
>> select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
>> select HAVE_KPROBES
>> + select HAVE_KRETPROBES if HAVE_KPROBES
>> select IOMMU_DMA if IOMMU_SUPPORT
>> select IRQ_DOMAIN
>> select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
>> index b35f76f..c116904 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
>> @@ -577,7 +577,80 @@ bool arch_within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
>>
>> void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> {
>> - return NULL;
>> + struct kretprobe_instance *ri = NULL;
>> + struct hlist_head *head, empty_rp;
>> + struct hlist_node *tmp;
>> + unsigned long flags, orig_ret_addr = 0;
>> + unsigned long trampoline_address =
>> + (unsigned long)&kretprobe_trampoline;
>> +
>> + INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&empty_rp);
>> + kretprobe_hash_lock(current, &head, &flags);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * It is possible to have multiple instances associated with a given
>> + * task either because multiple functions in the call path have
>> + * a return probe installed on them, and/or more than one return
>> + * probe was registered for a target function.
>> + *
>> + * We can handle this because:
>> + * - instances are always inserted at the head of the list
>> + * - when multiple return probes are registered for the same
>> + * function, the first instance's ret_addr will point to the
>> + * real return address, and all the rest will point to
>> + * kretprobe_trampoline
>> + */
>> + hlist_for_each_entry_safe(ri, tmp, head, hlist) {
>> + if (ri->task != current)
>> + /* another task is sharing our hash bucket */
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + if (ri->rp && ri->rp->handler) {
>> + __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, &ri->rp->kp);
>> + get_kprobe_ctlblk()->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
>> + ri->rp->handler(ri, regs);
>> + __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL);
>> + }
>> +
>> + orig_ret_addr = (unsigned long)ri->ret_addr;
>> + recycle_rp_inst(ri, &empty_rp);
>> +
>> + if (orig_ret_addr != trampoline_address)
>> + /*
>> + * This is the real return address. Any other
>> + * instances associated with this task are for
>> + * other calls deeper on the call stack
>> + */
>> + break;
>> + }
>
> This looks not included an improvement done by Syuhei, see
> commit 737480a0d525 ("kprobes/x86: Fix the return address of multiple kretprobes")
>
> Thank you!
>
I've updated the relevant part of this function with the current x86
version of the code.
>> +
>> + kretprobe_assert(ri, orig_ret_addr, trampoline_address);
>> + /* restore the original return address */
>> + instruction_pointer(regs) = orig_ret_addr;
>> + reset_current_kprobe();
>> + kretprobe_hash_unlock(current, &flags);
>> +
>> + hlist_for_each_entry_safe(ri, tmp, &empty_rp, hlist) {
>> + hlist_del(&ri->hlist);
>> + kfree(ri);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* return 1 so that post handlers not called */
>> + return (void *) orig_ret_addr;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
>> + struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> + ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->regs[30];
>> +
>> + /* replace return addr (x30) with trampoline */
>> + regs->regs[30] = (long)&kretprobe_trampoline;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> int __init arch_init_kprobes(void)
>> --
>> 2.5.0
>>
>
>
Thanks,
-dl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-22 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-03 3:26 [PATCH v13 00/10] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 01/10] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature David Long
2016-06-03 11:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-20 2:43 ` Li Bin
2016-06-23 13:48 ` David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 02/10] arm64: Add more test functions to insn.c David Long
2016-06-08 1:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-10 14:54 ` David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 03/10] arm64: add conditional instruction simulation support David Long
2016-06-04 3:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-13 4:19 ` David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 04/10] arm64: Blacklist non-kprobe-able symbol David Long
2016-06-04 3:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-07 3:52 ` David Long
2016-06-10 19:16 ` David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 05/10] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support David Long
2016-06-08 1:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-13 4:10 ` David Long
2016-06-13 6:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-13 15:22 ` David Long
2016-06-14 0:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-22 18:28 ` David Long
2016-06-14 1:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 06/10] arm64: Treat all entry code as non-kprobe-able David Long
2016-06-07 0:34 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 07/10] arm64: kprobes instruction simulation support David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 08/10] arm64: Add trampoline code for kretprobes David Long
2016-06-07 10:38 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-13 4:23 ` David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 09/10] arm64: Add kernel return probes support (kretprobes) David Long
2016-06-07 10:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-22 18:16 ` David Long [this message]
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 10/10] kprobes: Add arm64 case in kprobe example module David Long
2016-06-07 10:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-08 5:49 ` Huang Shijie
2016-06-27 2:54 ` David Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=576AD5F9.9090905@linaro.org \
--to=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).