From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 2/6] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:07:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57766B15.4090407@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467122152-5604-3-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
On 06/28/2016 03:55 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> ACPI 6.0 introduced an optional object _LPI that provides an alternate
> method to describe Low Power Idle states. It defines the local power
> states for each node in a hierarchical processor topology. The OSPM can
> use _LPI object to select a local power state for each level of processor
> hierarchy in the system. They used to produce a composite power state
> request that is presented to the platform by the OSPM.
>
> Since multiple processors affect the idle state for any non-leaf hierarchy
> node, coordination of idle state requests between the processors is
> required. ACPI supports two different coordination schemes: Platform
> coordinated and OS initiated.
>
> This patch adds initial support for Platform coordination scheme of LPI.
>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
Hi Sudeep,
I looked at the acpi processor idle code sometime ago and from my POV,
it was awful, unnecessary complex and very difficult to maintain. The
usage of flags all over the places is significant of the lack of control
of the written code.
Even if you are not responsible of this implementation, the current
situation forces you to add more awful code on top of that, which is
clearly against "making Linux better".
IMO, the current code deserves a huge cleanup before applying anything
new : cstate and lpi should be investigated to be self-contained in
their respective file and consolidated, the global variable usage should
be killed, redundant flag checking removed by recapturing the code flow,
etc ... I believe the usage of acpi probe table could be one entry point
to begin this cleanup.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-01 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-28 13:55 [PATCH v7 0/6] ACPI / processor_idle: Add ACPI v6.0 LPI support Sudeep Holla
2016-06-28 13:55 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] ACPI / processor_idle: introduce ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE Sudeep Holla
2016-06-28 13:55 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states Sudeep Holla
2016-07-01 13:07 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2016-07-04 13:00 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-07-04 13:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-04 13:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-07-04 14:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-28 13:55 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] arm64: cpuidle: drop __init section marker to arm_cpuidle_init Sudeep Holla
2016-06-28 13:55 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] cpuidle: introduce HAVE_GENERIC_CPUIDLE_ENTER for ARM{32, 64} platforms Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 13:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-07 13:34 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] cpuidle: introduce HAVE_GENERIC_CPUIDLE_ENTER for ARM{32,64} platforms Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 14:49 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] cpuidle: introduce HAVE_GENERIC_CPUIDLE_ENTER for ARM{32, 64} platforms Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-07 15:48 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] cpuidle: introduce HAVE_GENERIC_CPUIDLE_ENTER for ARM{32,64} platforms Sudeep Holla
2016-06-28 13:55 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI) Sudeep Holla
2016-06-28 13:55 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] ACPI : enable ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE on ARM64 Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57766B15.4090407@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).