From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: gabriel.fernandez@st.com (Gabriel Fernandez)
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 17:39:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] drivers: reset: Add STM32 reset driver
In-Reply-To: <1467725370.2978.64.camel@pengutronix.de>
References: <1467640052-6770-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
 <1467640052-6770-3-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
 <1467653810.2224.77.camel@pengutronix.de> <577B61EA.5080703@st.com>
 <1467725370.2978.64.camel@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <577D264A.4050709@st.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Philipp

On 07/05/2016 03:29 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 05.07.2016, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Gabriel Fernandez:
> [...]
>>>> +static const struct reset_control_ops stm32_reset_ops = {
>>>> +	.assert		= stm32_reset_assert,
>>>> +	.deassert	= stm32_reset_deassert,
>>> Are the registers not readable, or did you choose not to
>>> implement .status on purpose?
>> We choose to not implement.
> Ok. Because of size issues or just because you don't need them in any of
> your drivers?
Because i don't need them.

BR

Gabriel

>
> regards
> Philipp
>