From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:52:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos: correct the rtc compatible value for
 exynos5
In-Reply-To: <1468056226-19128-4-git-send-email-ayaka@soulik.info>
References: <1468056226-19128-1-git-send-email-ayaka@soulik.info>
 <1468056226-19128-4-git-send-email-ayaka@soulik.info>
Message-ID: <5783341F.1030006@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 07/09/2016 11:23 AM, Randy Li wrote:
> Those platforms are reported to use the same rtc IP core
> as exynos3250's.

Insufficient. Exynos4 also has to be updated. Actually all SoC from SoC
family requires rtc src clock. I think S3C6410 also requires it but I
don't have all the data necessary to confirm this.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

> 
> Signed-off-by: Randy Li <ayaka@soulik.info>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 2 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi    | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> index 62f3dcd..cdd69a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@
>  		};
>  
>  		rtc: rtc at 10070000 {
> -			compatible = "samsung,s3c6410-rtc";
> +			compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-rtc";
>  			reg = <0x10070000 0x100>;
>  			interrupts = <0 73 0>, <0 74 0>;
>  			interrupt-parent = <&pmu_system_controller>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
> index d5c0f18..71a1ad2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
>  	};
>  
>  	rtc: rtc at 101E0000 {
> -		compatible = "samsung,s3c6410-rtc";
> +		compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-rtc";
>  		reg = <0x101E0000 0x100>;
>  		interrupts = <0 43 0>, <0 44 0>;
>  		status = "disabled";
>