From: d-gerlach@ti.com (Dave Gerlach)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "ARM: AM33xx: fix module_wait_ready without clkctrl register"
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:34:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5784F1E2.1060605@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57848DD9.5070400@ti.com>
On 07/12/2016 01:27 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 12/07/16 06:34, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday 12 July 2016 03:09 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>> This reverts commit 183e2077d007aa4b697efba095ecfea7244a6107.
>>>
>>> The original patch added a check to am33xx_cm_wait_module_ready for a
>>> clkctrl offset of 0 as an invalid case, however, clkctrl offset of 0 is
>>> perfectly valid for hwmods, in particular the rtc.
>>
>> Looks like a similar check is present for am33xx_cm_wait_module_idle.
>> Shouldn't that also be removed?
>
> Oh this is annoying, I didn't notice that RTC had mutant register when I
> did the patch to add the check in place, and didn't face this issue
> either during testing. However, this check must be in there to avoid any
> issues with the transition to the hwmod clock data, as all the clkctrl
> offsets will be removed from hwmod data.
>
> I think for RTC we probably need to add some sort of HWMOD flag, and add
> a check within the hwmod code itself against this. Just reverting this
> patch is wrong approach, as you need to fix it some other way then.
I agree, that was another option I considered, but I went with reverting
it for now as there were no ill effects and we've made it this long with
out it.
I can send a new version with a flag soon.
Regards,
Dave
>
> -Tero
>
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Lokesh
>>
>>>
>>> Without reverting this patch sometimes external aborts are seen on
>>> am335x during boot. This is due to the am33xx_cm_wait_module_ready
>>> function immediately returning 0 rather than waiting for the RTC_CLKCTRL
>>> register to indicate it is actually ready before rtc register accesses
>>> happen.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm33xx.c | 3 ---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm33xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm33xx.c
>>> index c073fb57dd13..7b181f929525 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm33xx.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm33xx.c
>>> @@ -220,9 +220,6 @@ static int am33xx_cm_wait_module_ready(u8 part,
>>> s16 inst, u16 clkctrl_offs,
>>> {
>>> int i = 0;
>>>
>>> - if (!clkctrl_offs)
>>> - return 0;
>>> -
>>> omap_test_timeout(_is_module_ready(inst, clkctrl_offs),
>>> MAX_MODULE_READY_TIME, i);
>>>
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-12 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-11 21:39 [PATCH] Revert "ARM: AM33xx: fix module_wait_ready without clkctrl register" Dave Gerlach
2016-07-11 21:43 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-07-11 21:50 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-07-12 3:34 ` Lokesh Vutla
2016-07-12 6:27 ` Tero Kristo
2016-07-12 13:34 ` Dave Gerlach [this message]
2016-07-12 17:55 ` Dave Gerlach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5784F1E2.1060605@ti.com \
--to=d-gerlach@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).