From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tn@semihalf.com (Tomasz Nowicki) Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 07:05:00 +0200 Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] ECAM quirks handling for ARM64 platforms In-Reply-To: <20160719211753.GA17840@localhost> References: <1464856864-18049-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> <20160719211753.GA17840@localhost> Message-ID: <578F067C.7080509@semihalf.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 19.07.2016 23:17, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 10:41:00AM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: >> This series bases on pending ACPI PCI support for ARM64: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/30/468 >> >> Quirk handling relies on an idea of matching MCFG OEM ID and OEM revision >> (the ones from standard header of MCFG table). Linker section is used >> so that quirks can be registered using special macro (see patches) and >> kept self contained. >> >> As an example, last patch presents above mechanism usage for ThunderX PEM driver. >> >> Tomasz Nowicki (3): >> pci, acpi: Match PCI config space accessors against platfrom specific >> ECAM quirks. >> arm64, pci: Start using quirks handling for ACPI based PCI host >> controller. >> pci, pci-thunder-pem: Add ACPI support for ThunderX PEM. >> >> arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 7 +- >> drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 32 +++++++++ >> drivers/pci/host/pci-thunder-pem.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 7 ++ >> include/linux/pci-acpi.h | 19 ++++++ >> 5 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > Is this series superceded by Dongdong's series of 6/13 ("[RFC,V2,1/2] > ACPI/PCI: Match PCI config space accessors against platfrom specific ECAM > quirks")? > Yes this series had two another versions (v2,v3) posted by someone else. However, I posted another v4 which is the latest one: [RFC PATCH v4 0/5] ECAM quirks handling for ARM64 platforms https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/28/165 In v4 there is one minor thing to be fixed. Do you want me to resend it as v5 including mentioned fix ? Thanks, Tomasz