From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tthayer@opensource.altera.com (Thor Thayer) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:43:04 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 05/10] EDAC, altera: Add Arria10 NAND EDAC support In-Reply-To: <20160727171035.GA23851@nazgul.tnic> References: <1468512408-5156-1-git-send-email-tthayer@opensource.altera.com> <1468512408-5156-6-git-send-email-tthayer@opensource.altera.com> <20160727171035.GA23851@nazgul.tnic> Message-ID: <579900B8.3020502@opensource.altera.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/27/2016 12:10 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:06:43AM -0500, tthayer at opensource.altera.com wrote: >> From: Thor Thayer >> >> Add Altera Arria10 NAND FIFO memory EDAC support. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer >> --- >> drivers/edac/Kconfig | 7 +++++++ >> drivers/edac/altera_edac.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > ... > >> @@ -1589,7 +1619,9 @@ static int altr_edac_a10_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> else if ((of_device_is_compatible(child, >> "altr,socfpga-a10-ocram-ecc")) || >> (of_device_is_compatible(child, >> - "altr,socfpga-eth-mac-ecc"))) >> + "altr,socfpga-eth-mac-ecc")) || >> + (of_device_is_compatible(child, >> + "altr,socfpga-nand-ecc"))) >> altr_edac_a10_device_add(edac, child); >> else if (of_device_is_compatible(child, >> "altr,sdram-edac-a10")) > > Can we simplify this loop like this? > > for_each_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, child) { > if (!of_device_is_available(child)) > continue; > > if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,socfpga-a10-l2-ecc") || > of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,socfpga-a10-ocram-ecc") || > of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,socfpga-eth-mac-ecc") || > of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,socfpga-nand-ecc")) > > altr_edac_a10_device_add(edac, child); > > else if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,sdram-edac-a10")) > of_platform_populate(pdev->dev.of_node, > altr_sdram_ctrl_of_match, > NULL, &pdev->dev); > } > > I've merged the first "if" and subsequent "else if" because they all > do altr_edac_a10_device_add(edac, child) and added spacing for better > readability. > > Look ok? > > Or have I fatfingered it? > Yes, that's better. I was trying to stay within the 80 character limit but missed the if/else if improvement. Thanks, Boris! Should I re-submit? Thanks, Thor