From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori) Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 20:22:34 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: da850: Add basic DTS for the L138/C6748 Dev Kit In-Reply-To: <20160805144507.GA24855@gobelin> References: <20160804144332.4841-1-kbeldan@baylibre.com> <57A49F3A.9030306@ti.com> <20160805144507.GA24855@gobelin> Message-ID: <57A4A832.1000201@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 05 August 2016 08:15 PM, Karl Beldan wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 07:44:18PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Thursday 04 August 2016 08:13 PM, Karl Beldan wrote: >>> The LCDK is the successor to the late Hawkboard and has the same machine >>> number. >>> Among the differences are the flash (16bits vs 8bits) and some pins >>> (MMC, LEDs, buttons, some external connectors), however the main >>> components remain the same (eth. PHY, Audio Codec, Video decoder and >>> DAC) except for the main PMIC, different and hard-wired on the LCDK (the >>> LDOs and DCDCs are always ON). >>> A DT-only boot with this addition gives functional uart, reboot via >>> watchdog, rtc, ethernet and MMC (I added the CD gpio for the MMC >>> although davinci_mmc doesn't call yet the mmc core OF facilities). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Karl Beldan >> >> C6748 is a pin-compatible DSP-only part which does not run Linux. The >> OMAP-L138 and C6748 LCDKs are physically different boards. So, I would >> just stick with subject line ".. for the OMAP-L138 LCDK board" >> > That was my understanding but LCDK stands for L138-C6748-Dev-Kit right ? > Anyways, I'll remove the said references as per your request. You are right. And now that you clarify that, I think I am okay leaving what you have as-it-is. Use of C6748 threw me off. But thats just the acronym expansion. Thanks, Sekhar