From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: timur@codeaurora.org (Timur Tabi) Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:01:18 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer In-Reply-To: <20160811105848.GA25680@red-moon> References: <1469535565-20924-1-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <0befd611-91a7-88e9-1686-82929c1745e8@semihalf.com> <510fa357-a729-4ce1-7c10-4cef06feb7b7@linaro.org> <20160811105848.GA25680@red-moon> Message-ID: <57B4B47E.5030100@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > I do not think you need a v11 just to remove the drivers/acpi/arm64 > directory creation, you need to get Daniel/Thomas review/ack on > the respective patches though, I do not see the point of churning > out another series just because drivers/acpi/arm64 is now created > in the IORT patch series. If v10 is ok you will rebase it on top of > Tomasz's series and mention the dependency in the respective pull > request. > > If there is need for a v11 following Daniel/Thomas review yes, > you can proceed as above. What's the latest on this patchset? I really want them in 4.9. Is everything queued up, or are still issues that need to be resolved. Who will be merging these patches? -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.