From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cw00.choi@samsung.com (Chanwoo Choi) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:23:11 +0900 Subject: [PATCH v7 4/8] Documentation: bindings: add dt documentation for dfi controller In-Reply-To: <1471836984-6316-5-git-send-email-hl@rock-chips.com> References: <1471836984-6316-1-git-send-email-hl@rock-chips.com> <1471836984-6316-5-git-send-email-hl@rock-chips.com> Message-ID: <57BBDDBF.8040105@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Lin, On 2016? 08? 22? 12:36, Lin Huang wrote: > This patch adds the documentation for rockchip dfi devfreq-event driver. > > Signed-off-by: Lin Huang > --- > Changes in v7: > -None > > Changes in v6: > -None > > Changes in v5: > -None > > Changes in v4: > -None > > Changes in v3: > -None > > Changes in v2: > -None > > Changes in v1: > -None > .../bindings/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.txt | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..bf42255 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ > + > +* Rockchip rk3399 DFI device > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: Must be "rockchip,rk3399-dfi". > +- reg: physical base address of each DFI and length of memory mapped region > +- rockchip,pmu: phandle to the syscon managing the "pmu general register files" > +- clocks: phandles for clock specified in "clock-names" property > +- clock-names : the name of clock used by the DFI, must be "pclk_ddr_mon"; > + > +Example: > + dfi: dfi at 0xff630000 { > + reg = <0x00 0xff630000 0x00 0x4000>; > + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-dfi"; > + rockchip,pmu = <&pmugrf>; > + clocks = <&cru PCLK_DDR_MON>; > + clock-names = "pclk_ddr_mon"; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > I reviewed this patch on previous version[1] already. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/16/913 There are minor requirement. If you modify it, I'll finish the review of this patch. -- Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi