From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64, numa: Add cpu_to_node() implementation.
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 22:12:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57E143DA.5030602@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160920133813.GR25086@rric.localdomain>
On 09/20/2016 09:38 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 20.09.16 19:32:34, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 09/20/2016 06:43 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
>
>>> Instead we need to make sure the set_*numa_node() functions are called
>>> earlier before secondary cpus are booted. My suggested change for that
>>> is this:
>>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>>> index d93d43352504..952365c2f100 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>>> @@ -204,7 +204,6 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
>>> static void smp_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpuid)
>>> {
>>> store_cpu_topology(cpuid);
>>> - numa_store_cpu_info(cpuid);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>> @@ -719,6 +718,7 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>>> continue;
>>>
>>> set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
>>> + numa_store_cpu_info(cpu);
>>> }
>>> }
>>
>> We tried a similar approach which add numa_store_cpu_info() in
>> early_map_cpu_to_node(), and remove it from smp_store_cpu_info,
>> but didn't work for us, we will try your approach to see if works.
And it works :)
>
> Calling it in early_map_cpu_to_node() is probably too early since
> setup_node_to_cpumask_map() is called in numa_init() afterwards
> overwriting it again.
>
> Actually, early_map_cpu_to_node() is used to temporarily store the
> mapping until it can be setup in numa_store_cpu_info().
Thanks for the clarify, let's wait for David's reply on this one.
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-20 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-19 18:49 [PATCH] arm64, numa: Add cpu_to_node() implementation David Daney
2016-09-20 4:45 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-09-20 9:56 ` Yisheng Xie
2016-09-20 10:05 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-09-20 10:43 ` Robert Richter
2016-09-20 11:09 ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-20 11:32 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-09-20 13:21 ` Robert Richter
2016-09-27 6:26 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-10-06 9:15 ` Robert Richter
2016-09-20 13:38 ` Robert Richter
2016-09-20 14:12 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2016-09-21 16:42 ` Jon Masters
2016-09-20 17:53 ` David Daney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57E143DA.5030602@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).