From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: radioconfusion@gmail.com (radioconfusion at gmail.com) Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 10:24:50 +0300 Subject: [crypto] [marvell-cesa] Possible regression after Linux 4.7 Message-ID: <57d263c4.d5002e0a.8975e.0df2@mx.google.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, Thu, 8 Sep 2016 16:52:16 +0200, Romain Perier wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm testing the marvell-cesa -driver on Armada 385 board and I think I've found > > a regression between Linux 4.7 and 4.8-rc4. > > I want to accelerate my curl connections. So I compiled the 4.8-rc4 with > > marvell-cesa enabled and HEAD revision of cryptodev-linux. > > > > Here is my output: > > > > ~# uname -r > > 4.8.0-rc4 > > ~# modprobe cryptodev > > ~# modprobe marvell-cesa > > ~# curl -k --ciphers AES256-SHA256 https://myserver/myfile >/dev/null > > % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current > > Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed > > 19 200M 19 39.7M 0 0 16.2M 0 0:00:12 0:00:02 0:00:10 16.2M > > curl: (56) SSL read: error:1408F119:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:decryption > > failed or bad record mac, errno 0 > > --- snip --- > > Thank you for your feedbacks. > I can reproduce the issue with and without multiple engines. Thank you for your testing. Do you mean that you can reproduce it with Linux 4.7 too? > However, I have found an interesting thing, If I use only --ciphers > AES256, it works perfectly fine, could you confirm this ? Yes, I can confirm. And I have found the reason too. Most of available ciphers will not be accelerated at all. Only these ones I have verified to be accelerated by cesa: AES256-SHA256 AES256-SHA AES128-SHA256 AES128-SHA When cesa is working, I can see "irq/42-f1090000" on process list of top(1) and curl doesn't take all of available cpu. It's not easy to detect acceleration by performance because I tested with Linux 4.7 and older cryptodev (1.8 release) and I got average curl throughput ~22 MiB/s with AES256-SHA256 + cesa. Without cesa I got ~20 MiB/s average with same configuration. > In any case, I will investigate. Thank you very much. Best Regards, Jussi