linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: guohanjun@huawei.com (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm64/numa: fix incorrect print of end_pfn
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 20:21:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5808B6D1.809@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161020105130.GD24914@arm.com>

On 2016/10/20 18:51, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:52:56AM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>>
>> When booting on NUMA system with memory-less node (no
>> memory dimm on this memory controller), the print
>> for setup_node_data() is incorrect:
>>
>> NUMA: Initmem setup node 2 [mem 0x00000000-0xffffffffffffffff]
>>
>> It should be 0, not 0xffffffffffffffff as there is
>> no memory on that node.
> Wouldn't it make more sense to print something useful, like "memory-less
> node"?

in the log,

[    0.000000] NUMA: Initmem setup node 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x13fbffffff]
[    0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x13fbffe500-0x13fbffffff]
[    0.000000] NUMA: Initmem setup node 1 [mem 0x1400000000-0x17fbffffff]
[    0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x17fbfec500-0x17fbfedfff]
[    0.000000] NUMA: Initmem setup node 2 [mem 0x00000000-0xffffffffffffffff]
[    0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x17fbfeaa00-0x17fbfec4ff]
[    0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA(2) on node 1
[    0.000000] NUMA: Initmem setup node 3 [mem 0x00000000-0xffffffffffffffff]
[    0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x17fbfe8f00-0x17fbfea9ff]
[    0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA(3) on node 1

if printing "NUMA: Initmem setup node 2 [mem 0x00000000-0x00000000]",
it will make the log consistent with others, and obvious it's a memory-less
node as memory range 0x00000000-0x00000000, what do you think?

Thanks
Hanjun

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-20 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-20  3:52 [PATCH 1/2] arm64/numa: fix pcpu_cpu_distance() to get correct CPU proximity Hanjun Guo
2016-10-20  3:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64/numa: fix incorrect print of end_pfn Hanjun Guo
2016-10-20 10:51   ` Will Deacon
2016-10-20 12:21     ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2016-10-20 12:52       ` Will Deacon
2016-10-20 12:55       ` Mark Rutland
2016-10-20 13:26         ` Hanjun Guo
2016-10-20  4:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64/numa: fix pcpu_cpu_distance() to get correct CPU proximity Hanjun Guo
2016-10-20  6:39 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-10-20 10:48 ` Will Deacon
2016-10-20 12:05   ` Hanjun Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5808B6D1.809@huawei.com \
    --to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).