From: james.morse@arm.com (James Morse)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: acpi: arch_apei_get_mem_attributes() should use memblock
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:48:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5822FF0B.2080109@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <168e341f-2377-2962-34a4-63043d5ab6d6@codeaurora.org>
Hi Tyler,
On 08/11/16 18:41, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
> This patch seems fine, APEI/GHES functionality still works properly for me.
> I tested on a 4.8 kernel with the patch you mention below from Jonathan and
> my patchset https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/21/746
What are the memory attributes of the region your firmware writes the error
status data to?
I guess its attributes in the UEFI memory map must be 'NC' or <empty>. In which
case the current default of Device_nGnRnE isn't so wrong. Otherwise your
firmware must be doing some cache cleaning, which shouldn't be necessary.
> My only question is when you say that this may be called from an NMI context.
> arch_apei_get_mem_attributes() only gets called from ghes_ioremap_pfn_irq()
> which only appears to get called if we are not in an NMI context.
Yes, that's broken too.
ghes_ioremap_pfn_nmi() assumes PAGE_KERNEL. If firmware writes the error data
via a non-cachable mapping, it will tell us this via the UEFI memory map, which
we currently misread.
I have patches to fix this too, but it isn't needed until someone turns on
CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI on arm64 (or ia64...).
> So can this really be called from an NMI context?
Not today, but it may be in the future. Re-mapping the EFI memory map to read it
is possible in the short term, but generates more work if we ever want to
support CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI. I implied all this into the word 'may', I
will try to be clearer next time!
Thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-09 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-08 10:27 [PATCH] arm64: acpi: arch_apei_get_mem_attributes() should use memblock James Morse
2016-11-08 18:41 ` Baicar, Tyler
2016-11-09 10:48 ` James Morse [this message]
2016-11-09 12:12 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-09 18:14 ` James Morse
2016-11-09 18:25 ` Will Deacon
2016-11-09 20:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5822FF0B.2080109@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).