From: anurupvasu@gmail.com (Anurup M)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 03/11] drivers: soc: hisi: Add support for Hisilicon Djtag driver
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 15:53:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58259C31.7030009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4812554.ng09YGQfZ9@wuerfel>
On Thursday 10 November 2016 03:10 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 9:58:38 AM CET Anurup M wrote:
>>> I also see that the compatible strings have the version included in
>>> them, and you can probably drop them by requiring them only in the
>>> fallback:
>>>
>>> compatible = "hisilicon,hip05-cpu-djtag", "hisilicon,djtag-v1";
>>> compatible = "hisilicon,hip05-io-djtag", "hisilicon,djtag-v1";
>>> compatible = "hisilicon,hip06-cpu-djtag", "hisilicon,djtag-v1";
>>> compatible = "hisilicon,hip06-io-djtag", "hisilicon,djtag-v2";
>>> compatible = "hisilicon,hip07-cpu-djtag", "hisilicon,djtag-v2";
>>> compatible = "hisilicon,hip07-io-djtag", "hisilicon,djtag-v2";
>>>
>>> We want to have the first entry be as specific as possible, but
>>> the last (second) entry is the one that can be used by the driver
>>> for matching. When a future hip08/hip09/... chip uses an existing
>>> interface, you then don't have to update the driver.
>> Thanks. I had a similar thought on this. So as I have the version string
>> in the
>> second entry "-v(1/2)".
>> I can use it in driver for matching. So i think I will change it as below.
>> Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id djtag_of_match[] = {
>> - /* for hip05(D02) cpu die */
>> - { .compatible = "hisilicon,hip05-cpu-djtag-v1",
>> + /* for hisi djtag-v1 cpu die */
>> + { .compatible = "hisilicon,hisi-cpu-djtag-v1",
>> .data = djtag_readwrite_v1 },
>> - /* for hip05(D02) io die */
>> - { .compatible = "hisilicon,hip05-io-djtag-v1",
>> + /* for hisi djtag-v1 io die */
>> + { .compatible = "hisilicon,hisi-io-djtag-v1",
> From the code it looks like "hisilicon,hisi-io-djtag-v1" and
> "hisilicon,hisi-cpu-djtag-v1" have the same register-level interface,
> so we just need one compatible string for them to match the driver.
>
> Arnd
The djtag versions in CPU die and IO die can be different in the same chip.
For example in hip06, the CPU die has djtag-v1 whereas IO die has djtag-v2.
So I think it need two different compatible string
for hip06 chip CPU DIE "hisilicon,hisi-cpu-djtag-v1"
for hip06 chip IO DIE "hisilicon,hisi-io-djtag-v2"
Thanks,
Anurup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-11 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-02 15:42 [PATCH v1 00/11] perf: arm64: Support for Hisilicon SoC Hardware event counters Anurup M
2016-11-02 15:42 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] arm64: MAINTAINERS: hisi: Add hisilicon SoC PMU support Anurup M
2016-11-02 15:42 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] dt-bindings: hisi: Add Hisilicon HiP05/06/07 Sysctrl and Djtag dts bindings Anurup M
2016-11-02 15:42 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] drivers: soc: hisi: Add support for Hisilicon Djtag driver Anurup M
2016-11-03 1:59 ` kbuild test robot
2016-11-07 13:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-07 14:15 ` John Garry
2016-11-07 20:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-08 11:23 ` John Garry
2016-11-08 11:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-08 13:49 ` John Garry
2016-11-08 15:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-08 15:17 ` John Garry
2016-11-09 10:44 ` Anurup M
2016-11-08 15:51 ` Anurup M
2016-11-09 9:06 ` John Garry
2016-11-11 10:35 ` Anurup M
2016-11-08 7:02 ` Tan Xiaojun
2016-11-08 7:38 ` Anurup M
2016-11-08 11:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-08 13:46 ` Anurup M
2016-11-08 15:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-09 4:28 ` Anurup M
2016-11-09 21:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-11 10:23 ` Anurup M [this message]
2016-11-02 15:42 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] Documentation: perf: hisi: Documentation for HIP05/06/07 PMU event counting Anurup M
2016-11-02 15:42 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] dt-bindings: perf: hisi: Add Devicetree bindings for Hisilicon SoC PMU Anurup M
2016-11-02 15:42 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] perf: hisi: Update Kconfig for Hisilicon PMU support Anurup M
2016-11-02 15:42 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] perf: hisi: Add support for Hisilicon SoC event counters Anurup M
2016-11-02 15:42 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] perf: hisi: Add sysfs attributes for L3 cache(L3C) PMU Anurup M
2016-11-02 15:42 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] perf: hisi: Miscellanous node(MN) event counting in perf Anurup M
2016-11-02 15:42 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] perf: hisi: Support for Hisilicon DDRC PMU Anurup M
2016-11-02 15:42 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] dts: arm64: hip06: Add Hisilicon SoC PMU support Anurup M
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58259C31.7030009@gmail.com \
--to=anurupvasu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).