From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: vladimir.murzin@arm.com (Vladimir Murzin)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 17:38:57 +0000
Subject: [RFC PATCH 09/11] ARM: NOMMU: define SECTION_xxx macros
In-Reply-To: <58347A61.306@arm.com>
References: <1479806768-39911-1-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
 <1479806768-39911-10-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
 <20161122100713.GW1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <58343121.4030906@arm.com>
 <20161122115456.GX1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <58347A61.306@arm.com>
Message-ID: <583725B1.20907@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 22/11/16 17:03, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> On 22/11/16 11:54, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:50:57AM +0000, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>>> On 22/11/16 10:07, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 09:26:06AM +0000, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>>>>> Pickup defines from pgtable-2level.h to make NOMMU build happy.
>>>>
>>>> This needs more detail.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It comes from
>>>
>>>   CC      arch/arm/kernel/setup.o
>>> arch/arm/kernel/setup.c: In function 'reserve_crashkernel':
>>> arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:1001:25: error: 'SECTION_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>>              crash_size, SECTION_SIZE);
>>>                          ^
>>> arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:1001:25: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>>> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/kernel/setup.o] Error 1
>>> make: *** [arch/arm/kernel] Error 2
>>
>> Hmm, I decided not to use CRASH_ALIGN there because I didn't want to
>> break anyone's existing setup unnecessarily, however arguably it
>> should be CRASH_ALIGN to ensure that the new kernel is properly
>> positioned.
>>
>> I wonder if we can get away with changing that, rather than
>> unnecessarily introducing these otherwise meaningless definitions
>> for R-class.
>>
> 
> CRASH_ALIGN works fine but it seems not only user of SECTION_SIZE
> 
> In file included from ./include/linux/cache.h:4:0,
>                  from ./include/linux/printk.h:8,
>                  from ./include/linux/kernel.h:13,
>                  from arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c:15:
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c: In function 'omap_secure_ram_reserve_memblock':
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c:65:21: error: 'SECTION_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function)
>   size = ALIGN(size, SECTION_SIZE);
>                      ^
> ./include/uapi/linux/kernel.h:10:47: note: in definition of macro '__ALIGN_KERNEL_MASK'
>  #define __ALIGN_KERNEL_MASK(x, mask) (((x) + (mask)) & ~(mask))
>                                                ^
> ./include/linux/kernel.h:48:22: note: in expansion of macro '__ALIGN_KERNEL'
>  #define ALIGN(x, a)  __ALIGN_KERNEL((x), (a))
>                       ^
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c:65:9: note: in expansion of macro 'ALIGN'
>   size = ALIGN(size, SECTION_SIZE);
>          ^
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c:65:21: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>   size = ALIGN(size, SECTION_SIZE);
>                      ^
> ./include/uapi/linux/kernel.h:10:47: note: in definition of macro '__ALIGN_KERNEL_MASK'
>  #define __ALIGN_KERNEL_MASK(x, mask) (((x) + (mask)) & ~(mask))
>                                                ^
> ./include/linux/kernel.h:48:22: note: in expansion of macro '__ALIGN_KERNEL'
>  #define ALIGN(x, a)  __ALIGN_KERNEL((x), (a))
>                       ^
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c:65:9: note: in expansion of macro 'ALIGN'
>   size = ALIGN(size, SECTION_SIZE);
>          ^
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.o] Error 1

Russell, do you have further comment on this? I would try to address them in
the next version.

Thanks!
Vladimir

> 
> Cheers
> Vladimir
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>