From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: xuwei5@hisilicon.com (Wei Xu) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:35:54 +0000 Subject: [RFC PATCH] arm64: defconfig: enable SMMUv3 config In-Reply-To: <20170112094729.c2a5tjzsnyubtmte@localhost> References: <1483962646-33767-1-git-send-email-wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> <5876CF7C.8080907@hisilicon.com> <20170112094729.c2a5tjzsnyubtmte@localhost> Message-ID: <5878F3DA.3090005@hisilicon.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2017/1/12 9:47, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 08:36:12AM +0800, Zhou Wang wrote: >> On 2017/1/9 19:50, Zhou Wang wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>> index 869dded..3520c50 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>> @@ -440,6 +440,7 @@ CONFIG_PLATFORM_MHU=y >>> CONFIG_BCM2835_MBOX=y >>> CONFIG_HI6220_MBOX=y >>> CONFIG_ARM_SMMU=y >>> +CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3=y >>> CONFIG_RASPBERRYPI_POWER=y >>> CONFIG_QCOM_SMEM=y >>> CONFIG_QCOM_SMD=y >> >> I just happened to find there is no SMMUv3 config in arm64 defconfig. >> >> Maybe we should add it in defconfig or I miss something. > Hi Arnd, > It looks fine to me but it's usually the arm-soc guys picking the > defconfig patches. > It is fine to me. Is it OK for me to pick up this or will you directly pick up this? Thanks! Best Regards, Wei Xu