From: guohanjun@huawei.com (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 09/15] ACPI: platform-msi: retrieve dev id from IORT
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 12:28:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5879A8F3.7030303@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170113121144.GE20837@red-moon>
Hi Lorenzo,
On 2017/1/13 20:11, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 11:06:33PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> For devices connecting to ITS, it needs dev id to identify itself, and
>> this dev id is represented in the IORT table in named component node
>> [1] for platform devices, so in this patch we will scan the IORT to
>> retrieve device's dev id.
>>
>> For named components we know that there are always two steps
>> involved (second optional):
>>
>> (1) Retrieve the initial id (this may well provide the final mapping)
>> (2) Map the id (optional if (1) represents the map type we need), this
>> is needed for use cases such as NC (named component) -> SMMU -> ITS
>> mappings.
>>
>> we have API iort_node_get_id() for step (1) above and
>> iort_node_map_rid() for step (2), so create a wrapper
>> iort_node_map_platform_id() to retrieve the dev id.
>>
>> [1]: https://static.docs.arm.com/den0049/b/DEN0049B_IO_Remapping_Table.pdf
> This patch should be split and IORT changes should be squashed with
> patch 10.
If split the changes for IORT and its platform msi, API introduced in IORT will
not be used in a single patch, seems violate the suggestion of "new introduced API
needs to be used in the same patch", did I miss something?
>
>> Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>> Suggested-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>> Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-platform-msi.c | 4 +-
>> include/linux/acpi_iort.h | 8 ++++
>> 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> index 069a690..95fd20b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>> #define IORT_MSI_TYPE (1 << ACPI_IORT_NODE_ITS_GROUP)
>> #define IORT_IOMMU_TYPE ((1 << ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU) | \
>> (1 << ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3))
>> +#define IORT_TYPE_ANY (IORT_MSI_TYPE | IORT_IOMMU_TYPE)
>>
>> struct iort_its_msi_chip {
>> struct list_head list;
>> @@ -406,6 +407,34 @@ static struct acpi_iort_node *iort_node_map_id(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> +static
>> +struct acpi_iort_node *iort_node_map_platform_id(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
>> + u32 *id_out, u8 type_mask,
>> + int index)
>> +{
>> + struct acpi_iort_node *parent;
>> + u32 id;
>> +
>> + /* step 1: retrieve the initial dev id */
>> + parent = iort_node_get_id(node, &id, IORT_TYPE_ANY, index);
>> + if (!parent)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * optional step 2: map the initial dev id if its parent is not
>> + * the target type we wanted, map it again for the use cases such
>> + * as NC (named component) -> SMMU -> ITS. If the type is matched,
>> + * return the parent pointer directly.
>> + */
>> + if (!(IORT_TYPE_MASK(parent->type) & type_mask))
>> + parent = iort_node_map_id(parent, id, id_out, type_mask);
>> + else
>> + if (id_out)
> Remove this pointer check.
This was added because of NULL pointer reference, I passed NULL for id_out because I
only want to get its parent node, I think we have four options:
- Introduce a new API to get the parent only from the scratch, but it will duplicate the code
a lot;
- Don't check the id_out in iort_node_map_platform_id(), and introduce a wrapper and pass the
dummy id for iort_node_map_platform_id() :
static
struct acpi_iort_node *iort_node_get_platform_parent{struct device *dev, u8 type_mask}
{
struct acpi_iort_node *node, *parent = NULL;
int i;
u32 dummy_id;
node = iort_scan_node(ACPI_IORT_NODE_NAMED_COMPONENT,
iort_match_node_callback, dev);
if (!node)
return NULL;
for (i = 0; i < node->mapping_count; i++) {
/* we just want to get the parent node */
parent = iort_node_map_platform_id(node, &dummy_id,
IORT_MSI_TYPE, i);
if (parent)
break;
}
return parent;
}
- Similar solution as above but don't introduce wrapper, just use dummy_id if
iort_node_map_platform_id() is called;
- Use the solution I proposed in this patch.
Please share you suggestion on this :)
>
>> + *id_out = id;
>> +
>> + return parent;
>> +}
>> +
>> static struct acpi_iort_node *iort_find_dev_node(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct pci_bus *pbus;
>> @@ -444,6 +473,33 @@ u32 iort_msi_map_rid(struct device *dev, u32 req_id)
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> + * iort_pmsi_get_dev_id() - Get the device id for a device
>> + * @dev: The device for which the mapping is to be done.
>> + * @dev_id: The device ID found.
>> + *
>> + * Returns: 0 for successful find a dev id, errors otherwise
> Nit: -ENODEV on error
>
>> + */
>> +int iort_pmsi_get_dev_id(struct device *dev, u32 *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + struct acpi_iort_node *node;
>> +
>> + if (!iort_table)
>> + return -ENODEV;
> I do not think this iort_table check is needed.
Agreed, it will be checked in iort_scan_node() and it's called
in iort_find_dev_node().
>
>> + node = iort_find_dev_node(dev);
>> + if (!node)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < node->mapping_count; i++) {
>> + if(iort_node_map_platform_id(node, dev_id, IORT_MSI_TYPE, i))
> ^
>
> Nit: Missing a space.
I was on a flight when updating the patches, seems it's not a good place for coding :)
I will update the patch set when you are ok with the solutions I proposed, thank you
very much for the review.
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-14 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-11 15:06 [PATCH v7 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Hanjun Guo
2017-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH v7 01/15] ACPI: IORT: fix the indentation in iort_scan_node() Hanjun Guo
2017-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] ACPI: IORT: add missing comment for iort_dev_find_its_id() Hanjun Guo
2017-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] ACPI: IORT: minor cleanup for iort_match_node_callback() Hanjun Guo
2017-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH v7 04/15] irqchip: gic-v3-its: keep the head file include in alphabetic order Hanjun Guo
2017-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH v7 05/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: platform-msi: refactor its_pmsi_prepare() Hanjun Guo
2017-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH v7 06/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: platform-msi: refactor its_pmsi_init() to prepare for ACPI Hanjun Guo
2017-01-16 19:27 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH v7 07/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: platform-msi: scan MADT to create platform msi domain Hanjun Guo
2017-01-17 9:25 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH v7 08/15] ACPI: IORT: rename iort_node_map_rid() to make it generic Hanjun Guo
2017-01-13 11:47 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-01-14 3:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH v7 09/15] ACPI: platform-msi: retrieve dev id from IORT Hanjun Guo
2017-01-13 12:11 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-01-14 4:28 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2017-01-16 11:25 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-01-16 13:21 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH v7 10/15] ACPI: IORT: move over to iort_node_map_platform_id() Hanjun Guo
2017-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH v7 11/15] ACPI: platform: setup MSI domain for ACPI based platform device Hanjun Guo
2017-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH v7 12/15] msi: platform: make platform_msi_create_device_domain() ACPI aware Hanjun Guo
2017-01-13 10:45 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-01-14 3:00 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH v7 13/15] irqchip: mbigen: drop module owner Hanjun Guo
2017-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH v7 14/15] irqchip: mbigen: introduce mbigen_of_create_domain() Hanjun Guo
2017-01-11 15:06 ` [PATCH v7 15/15] irqchip: mbigen: Add ACPI support Hanjun Guo
2017-01-13 10:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-01-14 2:56 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-16 11:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-01-16 14:23 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-16 15:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-01-17 11:59 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-13 10:23 ` [PATCH v7 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Ming Lei
2017-01-14 1:04 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-13 14:11 ` Wei Xu
2017-01-14 4:30 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-16 5:12 ` Sinan Kaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5879A8F3.7030303@huawei.com \
--to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).