From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: xuwei5@hisilicon.com (Wei Xu) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:15:36 +0000 Subject: [RFC PATCH] arm64: defconfig: enable SMMUv3 config In-Reply-To: <3026029.1QgHzGBYeh@wuerfel> References: <1483962646-33767-1-git-send-email-wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> <20170112094729.c2a5tjzsnyubtmte@localhost> <5878F3DA.3090005@hisilicon.com> <3026029.1QgHzGBYeh@wuerfel> Message-ID: <587CF1A8.8020508@hisilicon.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Arnd, On 2017/1/13 16:58, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday, January 13, 2017 3:35:54 PM CET Wei Xu wrote: >> On 2017/1/12 9:47, Catalin Marinas wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 08:36:12AM +0800, Zhou Wang wrote: >>>> On 2017/1/9 19:50, Zhou Wang wrote: >>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 + >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>>>> index 869dded..3520c50 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>>>> @@ -440,6 +440,7 @@ CONFIG_PLATFORM_MHU=y >>>>> CONFIG_BCM2835_MBOX=y >>>>> CONFIG_HI6220_MBOX=y >>>>> CONFIG_ARM_SMMU=y >>>>> +CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3=y >>>>> CONFIG_RASPBERRYPI_POWER=y >>>>> CONFIG_QCOM_SMEM=y >>>>> CONFIG_QCOM_SMD=y >>>> >>>> I just happened to find there is no SMMUv3 config in arm64 defconfig. >>>> >>>> Maybe we should add it in defconfig or I miss something. >>> >> >> Hi Arnd, >> >>> It looks fine to me but it's usually the arm-soc guys picking the >>> defconfig patches. >>> >> >> It is fine to me. >> Is it OK for me to pick up this or will you directly pick up this? >> Thanks! > > Either way works for me. I usually recommend platform maintainers > picking up patches and then sending them on to arm at kernel.org, > as that gets our attention quicker. A patch that gets sent with > me personally on Cc might get lost in the email. In this case I will pick up it. Thanks! Best Regards, Wei > > Arnd > > > . >