From: mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com (Mathias Nyman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] usb: xhci-mtk: rebuild xhci_mtk_setup()
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:57:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58BECA4B.3010503@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488869841-9959-1-git-send-email-chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
On 07.03.2017 08:57, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> simplify xhci_mtk_setup() and add xhci_mtk_start() for
> xhci_driver_overrides struct
>
Code itself looks fine, but it's bit unclear for me what the benefit of this is?
> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.c
> index 67d5dc7..9636884 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.c
> @@ -381,8 +381,10 @@ static int usb_wakeup_of_property_parse(struct xhci_hcd_mtk *mtk,
> }
>
> static int xhci_mtk_setup(struct usb_hcd *hcd);
> +static int xhci_mtk_start(struct usb_hcd *hcd);
> static const struct xhci_driver_overrides xhci_mtk_overrides __initconst = {
> .reset = xhci_mtk_setup,
> + .start = xhci_mtk_start,
> };
>
> static struct hc_driver __read_mostly xhci_mtk_hc_driver;
> @@ -492,7 +494,6 @@ static void xhci_mtk_quirks(struct device *dev, struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
> /* called during probe() after chip reset completes */
> static int xhci_mtk_setup(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> {
> - struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd);
> struct xhci_hcd_mtk *mtk = hcd_to_mtk(hcd);
> int ret;
>
> @@ -502,9 +503,14 @@ static int xhci_mtk_setup(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ret = xhci_gen_setup(hcd, xhci_mtk_quirks);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + return xhci_gen_setup(hcd, xhci_mtk_quirks);
> +}
> +
> +static int xhci_mtk_start(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> +{
> + struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd);
> + struct xhci_hcd_mtk *mtk = hcd_to_mtk(hcd);
> + int ret;
>
> if (usb_hcd_is_primary_hcd(hcd)) {
> mtk->num_u3_ports = xhci->num_usb3_ports;
In theory this causes xhci_mtk_sch_init() to allocate new memory
for mtk->sch_array every time .start callback is called.
In practice it should not matter as .start is only called
when hcd is added in usb core.
Still wondering if there is a reason for this change?
-Mathias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-07 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-07 6:57 [PATCH 1/2] usb: xhci-mtk: rebuild xhci_mtk_setup() Chunfeng Yun
2017-03-07 6:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: xhci-mtk: fix checkpatch warning and erorr Chunfeng Yun
2017-03-07 14:57 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2017-03-08 1:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] usb: xhci-mtk: rebuild xhci_mtk_setup() Chunfeng Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58BECA4B.3010503@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).