From: anurupvasu@gmail.com (Anurup M)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 00/14] arm_pmu: ACPI support
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:41:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58ECF225.2040804@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1491899997-32210-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
On Tuesday 11 April 2017 02:09 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series implements ACPI support in the ARM PMU code. It borrows some code
> from Jeremy's series [1], but takes a different approach to probing and
> association, using the usual hotplug state machine, minimising external changes
> required, and simplifying the relationship with the common arm_pmu code.
>
> The first few patches are preparatory cleanup/refactoring, with the latter half
> of the series being specific to ACPI support.
>
> The series is based on Will's perf/updates branch [2]. I've pushed the whole
> series out to the arm/perf/acpi branch [3] of my kernel.org repo.
>
> Due to the innards of the hotplug callback framework, it's not entirely
> safe to register a PMU in a hotplug callback. Due to this, we can only
> associated hotplugged CPUs with a PMU if a matching CPU was around at
> probe time. A similar restriction already applies to DT systems. We may
> be able to relax this with some future work.
>
> I've given this some testing on a Juno platform (using SPIs). To see that IRQs
> are correctly associated, I've tested with the following:
>
> $ taskset -c ${SOME_CPU_HERE} perf record \
> -e armv8_pmuv3_0/cpu_cycles/ \
> -e armv8_pmuv3_1/cpu_cycles/ \
> cat /proc/interrupts
>
> I've also booted with nr_cpus temporarily capped (passing maxcpus=) to test the
> association logic. This has also been tested in a VM using PPIs; I do not have
> access to a host machine which itself uses PPIs.
I have tried these patches on a Hisilicon D03 board.
The perf list, basic perf events and perf fuzzer results are all fine.
'perf list' on Hisilicon D03
--------------------------------
L1-dcache-load-misses [Hardware cache event]
L1-dcache-loads [Hardware cache event]
L1-dcache-store-misses [Hardware cache event]
L1-dcache-stores [Hardware cache event]
L1-icache-load-misses [Hardware cache event]
L1-icache-loads [Hardware cache event]
branch-load-misses [Hardware cache event]
branch-loads [Hardware cache event]
dTLB-load-misses [Hardware cache event]
iTLB-load-misses [Hardware cache event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/br_mis_pred/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/br_pred/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/bus_access/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/bus_cycles/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/cid_write_retired/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/cpu_cycles/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/exc_return/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/exc_taken/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/inst_retired/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/inst_spec/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/l1d_cache/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/l1d_cache_refill/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/l1d_cache_wb/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/l1d_tlb_refill/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/l1i_cache/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/l1i_cache_refill/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/l1i_tlb_refill/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/l2d_cache/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/l2d_cache_refill/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/l2d_cache_wb/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/mem_access/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/memory_error/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/sw_incr/ [Kernel PMU event]
armv8_pmuv3_0/ttbr_write_retired/ [Kernel PMU event]
Thanks,
Anurup
> Since v1 [4]:
> * Fix up ACPI bits per Lorenzo's request
> * Accumulate tags
> * Check presence of PMUv3
>
> Since v2 [5]:
> * Clean up GSIs when a request fails
> * Rename parse/unparse functions
> * Use cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field() for PMUVer
> * Drop parking protocol cleanups. I'll resend these later.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-January/482397.html
> [2] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git perf/updates
> [3] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arm/perf/acpi
> [4] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-March/492897.html
> [5] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-April/499982.html
>
> Mark Rutland (14):
> drivers/perf: arm_pmu: remove pointless PMU disabling
> drivers/perf: arm_pmu: define armpmu_init_fn
> drivers/perf: arm_pmu: fold init into alloc
> drivers/perf: arm_pmu: factor out pmu registration
> drivers/perf: arm_pmu: simplify cpu_pmu_request_irqs()
> drivers/perf: arm_pmu: handle no platform_device
> drivers/perf: arm_pmu: rename irq request/free functions
> drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split cpu-local irq request/free
> drivers/perf: arm_pmu: move irq request/free into probe
> drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split out platform device probe logic
> arm64: add function to get a cpu's MADT GICC table
> drivers/perf: arm_pmu: add ACPI framework
> arm64: pmuv3: handle !PMUv3 when probing
> arm64: pmuv3: use arm_pmu ACPI framework
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 113 ++++++++----
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 10 ++
> drivers/perf/Kconfig | 4 +
> drivers/perf/Makefile | 3 +-
> drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 387 ++++++++++------------------------------
> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c | 256 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c | 235 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 1 +
> include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 22 ++-
> 10 files changed, 708 insertions(+), 325 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-11 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-11 8:39 [PATCHv3 00/14] arm_pmu: ACPI support Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 01/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: remove pointless PMU disabling Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 02/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: define armpmu_init_fn Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 03/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: fold init into alloc Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 04/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: factor out pmu registration Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 05/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: simplify cpu_pmu_request_irqs() Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 06/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: handle no platform_device Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 07/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: rename irq request/free functions Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 08/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split cpu-local irq request/free Mark Rutland
2017-04-18 17:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-18 18:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-18 18:33 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-18 18:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-20 19:10 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 09/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: move irq request/free into probe Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 10/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split out platform device probe logic Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 11/14] arm64: add function to get a cpu's MADT GICC table Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 12/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: add ACPI framework Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 13/14] arm64: pmuv3: handle !PMUv3 when probing Mark Rutland
2017-04-13 14:06 ` Jayachandran C.
2017-04-13 15:36 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 14/14] arm64: pmuv3: use arm_pmu ACPI framework Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 15:11 ` Anurup M [this message]
2017-04-11 15:45 ` [PATCHv3 00/14] arm_pmu: ACPI support Will Deacon
2017-04-12 6:48 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58ECF225.2040804@gmail.com \
--to=anurupvasu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).