From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: julien.grall@arm.com (Julien Grall) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 16:30:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v3 17/41] KVM: arm64: Remove noop calls to timer save/restore from VHE switch In-Reply-To: <20180213223134.GK23189@cbox> References: <20180112120747.27999-1-christoffer.dall@linaro.org> <20180112120747.27999-18-christoffer.dall@linaro.org> <20074994-caac-2be0-6eaa-83115c616756@arm.com> <20180213223134.GK23189@cbox> Message-ID: <591b3937-7a53-afb3-7f2f-e859d3e46601@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Christoffer, Sorry for the late reply. On 13/02/18 22:31, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 05:53:43PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi Christoffer, >> >> On 01/12/2018 12:07 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>> The VHE switch function calls __timer_enable_traps and >>> __timer_disable_traps which don't do anything on VHE systems. >>> Therefore, simply remove these calls from the VHE switch function and >>> make the functions non-conditional as they are now only called from the >>> non-VHE switch path. >>> >>> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier >>> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 2 -- >>> virt/kvm/arm/hyp/timer-sr.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- >>> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c >>> index 9aadef6966bf..6175fcb33ed2 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c >>> @@ -354,7 +354,6 @@ int kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>> __activate_vm(vcpu->kvm); >>> __vgic_restore_state(vcpu); >>> - __timer_enable_traps(vcpu); >>> /* >>> * We must restore the 32-bit state before the sysregs, thanks >>> @@ -373,7 +372,6 @@ int kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>> __sysreg_save_guest_state(guest_ctxt); >>> __sysreg32_save_state(vcpu); >>> - __timer_disable_traps(vcpu); >>> __vgic_save_state(vcpu); >>> __deactivate_traps(vcpu); >>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/timer-sr.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/timer-sr.c >>> index f24404b3c8df..77754a62eb0c 100644 >>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/timer-sr.c >>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/timer-sr.c >>> @@ -27,34 +27,34 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_timer_set_cntvoff(u32 cntvoff_low, u32 cntvoff_high) >>> write_sysreg(cntvoff, cntvoff_el2); >>> } >>> +/* >>> + * Should only be called on non-VHE systems. >>> + * VHE systems use EL2 timers and configure EL1 timers in kvm_timer_init_vhe(). >>> + */ >>> void __hyp_text __timer_disable_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> >> Would it be worth to suffix the function with nvhe? So it would be clear >> that it should not be called for VHE system? >> > Actually, I decided against this, because it's also called from the > 32-bit code and it looks a little strange there, and it's not like we > have an equivalent _vhe version. The main goal was to provide a naming that would prevent someone to use it in VHE case. This would have also been inline with other patches where you rename some helpers to nvhe/vhe even in arm32 code. Anyway, I guess the reviewers will be careful enough to spot that :). Cheers, -- Julien Grall